Jump to content

Revitalzing, for SCIENCE!


TheCrawlingCreepypasta

Recommended Posts

The article subsection is great, but kind of deader than a zombie that was thrown off the Grand Canyon into a pit full of spikes that fire lasers.

So, I thought it might be ideal to find out what people are interested in learning about, that way the community can try and collectively understand what would be useful to learn.

So, what are you gentulpamen and hosts interested in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel there needs to be a lot more stuff on switching and imposition. It's an enigma to Eva and myself because there simply isn't enough information on it.

"Try to get a better understanding of things before making your judgement." -Khan, Metro 2033

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

I would like to hear more from those with "accidental tulpas." I would like to see a thread about those experiences and how it all happened and compare those experiences to what people are doing on purpose using the guides. It would be interesting to see the differences and any commonalities.

 

Also, I would really like to know if there is anyone else, who didn't follow a tulpa creation guide, and so ended up with a thoughtform similar to Melian, who is only semi-autonomous and part day dream star (often puppeted or parroted in imaginary fantasies). If you read the forum and talk to people here you quickly learn not every tulpa was created using guides and many are a lot older than just three or four years (or weeks or months old).

 

I want to learn about tulpas with unusual traits that make the writers of the guides scratch their heads and purists freak out and almost die of contortions of outrage. I want to see the forum push the boundaries to tulpa science outside of the narrow box it is currently in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes I wonder if it's just for the sake of philosophy in general since making a model of life assessment and analysis with tulpas through implications of science leads to scientism. A lot of what people think would be scientifically related would be more grounded on philosophy (e.g. ontology, epistemology, etc).

 

Oh well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

Probably true. Tulpas are one of those things that are in a fuzzy area scientifically and one can easily slide into the realm of philosophy or metaphysics when trying to discuss their parameters and origin and nature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably true. Tulpas are one of those things that are in a fuzzy area scientifically and one can easily slide into the realm of philosophy or metaphysics when trying to discuss their parameters and origin and nature.

 

Link 1

Link 2

Link 3 (Harsh man, harsh)

 

Fuzzy is a bit of an understatement there, Mist. Thanks for your feedback, peeps! Keep it coming, my break is coming up soon so maybe I can write something useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

 

Link 1

Link 2

Link 3 (Harsh man, harsh)

 

Fuzzy is a bit of an understatement there, Mist. Thanks for your feedback, peeps! Keep it coming, my break is coming up soon so maybe I can write something useful.

 

I had to react this from your second link...

 

Which leads into the next question—“But if tulpas originate from your subconscious self, then aren’t you just roleplaying?” This is the interesting part—tulpamancers are not roleplaying. Maybe some people do, but they aren’t tulpamancers—they’re roleplayers."

 

I would argue that this is too simple saying you are either a tulpamancer or a role player. It isn't that black and white at all. I think there is definitely a grey area, especially with developing tulpas, and to say such a thing is a false assumption at best and a total outright lie at worst.

 

But I will drop it there as it will take us away from the primary point of the OP. I just ... had to. That kind of black and white absolutist thinking just irritates me.

 

My reaction to the assertion that tulpas are not imaginary friends in link 3?

 

BULL SHIT! Of course they are imaginary friends. Imaginary friends are of the same basic material as a tulpa. The host just spends a lot more concentration, time and mind power in making a much more real seeming imaginary friend.

 

Again back to the OP. My apologies. I just hate the way people make tulpas out to be some sort of cosmic science that every eight year old kid hasn't tried his or her hand in (imaginary friends). LOL It isn't rocket science and it isn't all that mysterious or all these high school kids wouldn't have tulpas, only Einsteins and Ghandis would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Dang, by PMing Mistgod and ranting to each other about mainstream science I forgot all about this thread! I can't let this thread die a thread less than 1 page long death! The discussion must continue!

So, besides the already chronicled:

-switching and imposition

-anomaly tulpas

-accidental tulpas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

Crap everything is my fault. LOL Actually, I am glad you went back to it, it's a good thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...