All Activity

Five came back again

I sorta just came back and didn't make a big deal of it besides explaining why I vanished for years in my PR

I've heard a couple people say that recently. It feels embarrassing to discuss with people

I've felt pretty displaced from the tulpa community for a long time tbh

Yeah, it's nice to see! 😊 I don't have the time read it all though.

There's been an invasion of oldheads

I see there's been more discussion on the forums lately

Wassup yuka!

GER, Yukari! 😊

Definitely been one so far, aside from the complete lack of sleep

good earth rotation

That's really good actually This new chapter has to have at least one reference to undertale yellow

that's what i meant it says it's going to be on both

Well KH3 and then eventually all the collections were on PC, so it only makes sense PC on release is the nice thing, on steam and not just Epic would be even better

wait, in the trailer that wasn't in nintendo direct, they show all the platforms it's going to be on. the fact that they're releasing it on pc is actually really exciting

sora isn't edgy, but there are other keyblade wielders like riku and roxas who can be varying degrees of edgy at times, so it's not technically wrong

I see

He's most certainly not edgy lol, he's just a kid/teen doing his best in this Disney Square Enix world...

she couldn't be strelitzia. the voices are different you mean subject x? subject x is definitely not kairi kingdom hearts has a bunch of final fantasy characters, including sephiroth. he's an extremely minor character though

I know who dis

And it's on Steam? This is awesome!

Sepiroth is final fantasy, matt Shit, I still have to do the weird route for them

We need to play Kingdom Hearts at some point. (Kinda funny to say after what Matt said.) Probably after Undertale, which I think we'll be getting soon.

I never understood Kingdom Hearts? It's like, some edgy kid with a key sword and there's mickey mouse, donald duck and sephiroth??? It'll be one of the games I pick up in my late boomer age

I'm well aware that forms are not necessary for tulpas, but using it for tulpa creation is so ubiquitous in online guides it's kinda hard to not use it altogether... But I do agree that my end result will probably be a tulpa without a concrete form. I'm fairly curious, as well. Aphantasia itself is a relatively unstudied topic, but current scientific understanding (to my knowledge) is that it may be cause by different connections of strength in different parts of the brain -- for example, a case study involving an aphantasic twin and an imagery twin showed the aphantasic had a bilateral brain dominance compared to the imager who was much more left-sided, as well as lower connection between brain lobes pertaining to sight and conscious recall. Here's a link to the study if you want to read it. There are like less than 50 actual scientific studies on the the topic ever (I'm exaggerating, but not by much), so from an academic standpoint it's basically an unknown. I've looked around online, and most of these "cures" are case by case per individual, rather than actual methods to cultivate visual imagery from nothing. Most of them have little to no actual research behind them, it's all very "this worked for me you should try it out." Besides, I want to work within the confines of non visualization, as it is kinda how I've lived my entire life. Furthermore, I want to experiment with how thoughtforms like tulpas can influence mental imagery in people unable of conjuring in the mind's eye themselves. Again, I don't visual form is a necessity for a tulpa; just that the community at large relied on the ability to visualize as one of the cornerstones of tulpa creation, and thus visualization techniques are a cornerstone of the current understanding of formation. The population of aphantasics in the entire world is less than 5 percent, and the population of aphantasics with tulpas is, to my knowledge, very small.