Antylamon

Members
  • Content Count

    88
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Antylamon

  • Rank
    Member

Converted

  • Sex
    Female
  1. "Established psychological approach" doesn't sound very honest tbh. :| Nvm interpreted it wrong
  2. Yeah, I have a pretty good amount of experience with editing wikis (well, a wiki) and there's no chance of tulpa.info getting in there.
  3. Thank you and sorry for the commotion. I'm sincerely an idiot.
  4. I don't see your point. I think I may be hiding from the meaning by looking for multiple possible interpretations. Be brutally honest.
  5. You're kind of putting what I already knew intuitively into words. The only odd thing is I thought every tulpa experienced emotion through the body. So I guess yours doesn't?
  6. Sorry, poor word choice. By "creation" I meant connecting neurons together. I thought it was obvious, but I'm clearly wrong, since you're acting so condescending about it. I do want to know more about neurology, but I'm waiting until the school year starts again since I know it's the best place to start. Beyond that I'll agree on some points and agree to disagree on others. Now can we stop escalating this? It's not worth stressing over poor word choice. At this point I'm starting to think we both look like idiots right now.
  7. I Google'd it, but I couldn't really find anything. I mean come on, we're talking about tulpas. ...Wait a sec, you were wrong in the first place. Damn, I'm more gullible than I thought. What I said is a working hypothesis, not a theory I claim is proven. I thought ideas about tulpas are basically given to be hypotheses. My hypothesis is that creating a biological neural network large enough for a sentient tulpa cannot be done on a whim. If you know more about neurology and you know my hypothesis is false, then I stand corrected, but it's still not pseudoscience when it's just a hypothesis.
  8. You're just being dismissive. Mentality means everything, so I'm asking you to change your mentality about how you view tulpas somewhat. Your mind makes it real; that's the idea behind tulpas. So convince yourself that accidental tulpas won't pop up and your mind will make that idea real. Believe me, if you really want to convince yourself and have a good reason for doing so, it will happen. Hell, if you have a bad reason for doing so it can still happen pretty easily if you're in a stressful situation.
  9. I don't really see how anyone could really critique this. When it comes to tulpas and tulpaforcing, symbolism is about what works for you, not what works for someone else.
  10. If you don't want to create tulpas, then stop believing in accidental tulpas. It's not like the brain can connect enough neurons to create another sentient, self-aware being in under a minute.
  11. If having over 5 tulpas doesn't fry your brain, then I'm pretty sure we're safe.
  12. That laziness happens to a lot more people than you think. Yes, in the degree that you explained. It's not like everyone would be willing to tell you the worst aspect of themselves.