Stanford Tulpa Study looking for more participants
(if you're chosen they'll pay for travel and lodging!)

GAT Voting 2016
#11
+1 to FallFamily, NoneFromHell, and Vosaiu
Sharu (host) || Arro (tulpa)
Reply

Sponsors:
Lolflash - click it, you know you want to

#12
Screw you, Lacquer, you're getting a +1 from me. Your reasons for voting against yourself are silly and and I think you would only be an asset on the GAT team.

I'd give everyone a +1 but it won't really do anything, so I will hold onto my votes for when it does.
Reply
#13
I'll give +1 to Lacquer, seeing as he'd be a valuable addition to the team, from what I've seen of him.

Giving points to anyone else would seem like a pat on the back more than anything else, so I'll leave it at that. I'm very happy with all the other candidates.
Feel free to ask me anything.
Suffering is self-imposed. Don't let it control you.
Reply
#14
As far as I am aware, it seems that everyone present is a strong candidate that has plenty of knowledge in the field. Giving a +1 across the board is pointless and nobody seems to be at risk of being disqualified. And on the other hand, I do not have enough experience with half the people so I do not exactly feel qualified to be discriminating between the candidates.
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit." -Aristotle

"When you arise in the morning, think of what a precious privilege it is to be alive - to breathe, to think, to enjoy, to love." -Marcus Aurelius

“Fairy tales are more than true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten.” -Neil Gaiman

"The master has failed more times than the beginner has even tried." -Stephen McCranie
Reply
#15
(01-12-2016, 03:02 AM)Metatron Wrote: I do not have enough experience with half the people so I do not exactly feel qualified to be discriminating between the candidates.

Tewi: It's not a competition, so it's not discriminating unless you give the others you don't know negative votes. No problem with voting for those you know.

Maybe they deserve pats on the back. I kind of wanted to see how high everyone's votes got, but you guys stopped voting already.. That's bad statistics, man.
Hi guys, plain text is just me now! We've each got our own accounts: me, Tewi, Flandre, and Lucilyn. We're Luminesce's tulpas.
Here's our "Ask Thread", and here's our Progress Report (You should be able to see all of our accounts on the second page if you want)
Reply
#16
Well in response to that, I would give Yuki and Vosaiu +1s for knowing their shit. jean-luc and NoneFromHell would also both get +1s for being pretty funny folk. Who knows, maybe there needs to be more humor around.
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit." -Aristotle

"When you arise in the morning, think of what a precious privilege it is to be alive - to breathe, to think, to enjoy, to love." -Marcus Aurelius

“Fairy tales are more than true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten.” -Neil Gaiman

"The master has failed more times than the beginner has even tried." -Stephen McCranie
Reply
#17
Metatron Wrote:And on the other hand, I do not have enough experience with half the people

Well... I only really came back around a month ago. But, as long as you have an opinion, you might as well make good use of the opportunity at hand.
Reply
#18
It sounds like a pretty solid team. I give a +1 to Vosaiu, Sock, jean-luc, Yuki and NoneFromHell
Reply
#19
No vote (at this time)

When you have the option of detrimenting certain people, you need an anonymous vote not a public one. Otherwise people never downvote to avoid having hurt feelings towards them. The election is unlikely to change unless two people downvote Lacquer, other than that everyone's a winner. Congrats on the pointless election.
Reply
#20
(01-13-2016, 04:08 AM)jean-luc Wrote: No vote (at this time)

When you have the option of detrimenting certain people, you need an anonymous vote not a public one. Otherwise people never downvote to avoid having hurt feelings towards them. The election is unlikely to change unless two people downvote Lacquer, other than that everyone's a winner. Congrats on the pointless election.

To be fair, yes, I agree to what you said. That everyone is a winner. But, with the influx of new GAT members, I am certain that there will be more content submission, and other steps taken towards revitalizing, learning and observing this psychological phenomenon.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Sponsors:
Lolflash - click it, you know you want to