Guest Anonymous October 18, 2015 Share October 18, 2015 Tulpas are amazing. It is amazing that they are apparently independent consciousness in the mind of the creator. I love it! I love Tulpa Info and I love tulpas. BUT... I am a believer in all thoughtforms. I think all thoughtforms are equally legitimate and have equal value. This includes imaginary friends, literary characters, role playing characters, soulbonds, deamons, and tulpas. To my mind, there would be absolutely nothing wrong with a person role playing a PC who wants to sit down and to talk to a tulpa within a make believe wonderland setting. It doesn't de-legitimize the tulpa nor imply the role playing character is a tulpa. They are both thoughtforms, just different types. Tulpas have amazing traits in that they are independently conscious. That is neat beyond belief. But my role playing character Turon Tursar (for example, I have many characters) is in fact a thoughtform made of the same basic material as a tulpa. He may have to be puppeted and narrated by me, but he is just as legitimate to me. He has been in my mind since 1985. No he is not a tulpa. He is a role playing character. But he is still important to me and may have some important things to say as I act him out. My thoughtform Melian is somewhere in between a role playing character and a tulpa. I have no problem with this. None. That perspective about thoughtforms is what is causing my angst with many people in the chat especially, but sometimes on this forum as well. I am not about to change it however. I am going to share it. To those coming in from the chat rooms STOP ACCUSING ME OF LYING AND FAKERY. When it comes to all thoughtforms, including role playing characters and tulpas, they are either all equally fake or none of them are fake. I prefer to believe that there is no such thing as fake, only imaginary. Imaginary things are important and have meaning. I want my role playing character to hug your tulpa. EDIT: How are young tulpas any different from imaginary friends? https://community.tulpa.info/thread-how-are-young-tulpas-and-imaginary-friends-different EDIT: One thing I would add is the joy I have in sharing Melian and letting her loose on Deviantart. She has so many imaginative and creative friends there. She has been drawn and painted dozens and dozens of times and been a character in literature (cameo appearances). Everyone seems to love her and want to spend time with her. Just today a fan of hers, who is a professional comic artist, posted a new painting of her at a Christmas party with many of her story friends. Melian has no trouble or inhibitions with mixing it up with literary characters, role playing characters and any kind of imaginary person. She lives within dreams and so everyone is a person to her, imaginary or real. That is why I often say all thoughtforms are legitimate people. Because Melian feels they are. It doesn't matter if they even come from a story. She lives in day dreams and has walked through story worlds with fictional characters and talked to people in real life. To her, it is all one and the same thing. Here is a close up from the painting posted by Nathan Rackley today. It is quite an honor for us. The original painting with all the characters can be found here on Deviantnart: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.