Jump to content

GAT Voting 2016


Sands
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Screw you, Lacquer, you're getting a +1 from me. Your reasons for voting against yourself are silly and and I think you would only be an asset on the GAT team.

 

I'd give everyone a +1 but it won't really do anything, so I will hold onto my votes for when it does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll give +1 to Lacquer, seeing as he'd be a valuable addition to the team, from what I've seen of him.

 

Giving points to anyone else would seem like a pat on the back more than anything else, so I'll leave it at that. I'm very happy with all the other candidates.

Feel free to ask me anything.

Suffering is self-imposed. Don't let it control you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware, it seems that everyone present is a strong candidate that has plenty of knowledge in the field. Giving a +1 across the board is pointless and nobody seems to be at risk of being disqualified. And on the other hand, I do not have enough experience with half the people so I do not exactly feel qualified to be discriminating between the candidates.

"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit." -Aristotle

 

"When you arise in the morning, think of what a precious privilege it is to be alive - to breathe, to think, to enjoy, to love." -Marcus Aurelius

 

“Fairy tales are more than true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten.” -Neil Gaiman

 

"The master has failed more times than the beginner has even tried." -Stephen McCranie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not have enough experience with half the people so I do not exactly feel qualified to be discriminating between the candidates.

 

Tewi: It's not a competition, so it's not discriminating unless you give the others you don't know negative votes. No problem with voting for those you know.

 

Maybe they deserve pats on the back. I kind of wanted to see how high everyone's votes got, but you guys stopped voting already.. That's bad statistics, man.

Hi guys, plain text is just me now! We've each got our own accounts: me, Tewi, Flandre, and Lucilyn. We're Luminesce's tulpas.

Here's our "Ask Thread", and here's our Progress Report (You should be able to see all of our accounts on the second page if you want)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well in response to that, I would give Yuki and Vosaiu +1s for knowing their shit. jean-luc and NoneFromHell would also both get +1s for being pretty funny folk. Who knows, maybe there needs to be more humor around.

"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit." -Aristotle

 

"When you arise in the morning, think of what a precious privilege it is to be alive - to breathe, to think, to enjoy, to love." -Marcus Aurelius

 

“Fairy tales are more than true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten.” -Neil Gaiman

 

"The master has failed more times than the beginner has even tried." -Stephen McCranie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And on the other hand' date=' I do not have enough experience with half the people[/quote']

 

Well... I only really came back around a month ago. But, as long as you have an opinion, you might as well make good use of the opportunity at hand.

 

Ah, I'm too tired. I only came here to help.

« — Va, je ne te hais point ! »

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No vote (at this time)

 

When you have the option of detrimenting certain people, you need an anonymous vote not a public one. Otherwise people never downvote to avoid having hurt feelings towards them. The election is unlikely to change unless two people downvote Lacquer, other than that everyone's a winner. Congrats on the pointless election.

I don't visit as often as I used to. If you want me to see something, make sure to quote a post of mine or ping me @jean-luc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No vote (at this time)

 

When you have the option of detrimenting certain people, you need an anonymous vote not a public one. Otherwise people never downvote to avoid having hurt feelings towards them. The election is unlikely to change unless two people downvote Lacquer, other than that everyone's a winner. Congrats on the pointless election.

 

To be fair, yes, I agree to what you said. That everyone is a winner. But, with the influx of new GAT members, I am certain that there will be more content submission, and other steps taken towards revitalizing, learning and observing this psychological phenomenon.

 

Ah, I'm too tired. I only came here to help.

« — Va, je ne te hais point ! »

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...