Jump to content

The No-Bullshit Tulpa Book

Recommended Posts

Guest Anonymous

I see why you are saying "it is a work of fiction" to protect yourself legally, but it kinda instantly removes all credibility to what you are going to say next. It's like saying this "This is a No Bullshit book on tulpas. Everything from here on is bull shit."

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic



I don't force you to read it, right? Or if you read it, I don't force you to believe anything written inside (that's actually written in the book). I only suggest you some food for thought and that is the single intent of the book — to make people think about what they do.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anonymous

I have already decided to read your fictional No Bull Shit Tulpa Book. Apparently it is left up to me to decide if it is credible and if it wonkies up my brain I can't sue damn it. Cause you said it is fiction.

I have a book too. It is totally not bull shit either but I leave it to the reader to decide. My hostie and I put this on the first page "The reader will decide if the concept presented is credible. As for me, I believe in it. I want to and so I can."



Link to post
Share on other sites

It's fine as a link, yeah. And I guess Resources makes sense. It's hard to really say right now, because it's incomplete, I guess. But if you're not planning on adding more guide-y elements to it, then okay. And yeah, I guess it's kinda incomplete for now, so if/when you do finish it, I guess you could post in this thread to let us know. I approve, anyway. As a useful book it looks fine, and there's not really much I'd say that's wrong about it. So take the below as just my thoughts.



I quite like it. I think as a completed work it could be pretty nice. It's clearly written, I think that the advice given is, well, interesting. It might not be what I'd recommend, but it looks pretty helpful anyway. What you've written on topics that I'm familiar with looks okay, and I don't really know enough about, well, Buddhism in general, to comment on the rest in a useful way.


With that said, I guess I'm mostly curious as to why you present it as "no-bullshit", specifically. That seems to be a misnomer to me.

The no-bullshit statement is explained as follows: the book is written in as simple language as possible, without any cryptic words that are never explained.

That's true.

The book authors never ask you to trust anything blindly (on the contrary!) and try to provide references to experience the statements made in the book.

Really? You make a hell of a lot of strong claims in the book. I'm not sure what you mean here; do you mean that you state these things but don't ask others to believe them? In that sense it's not any different from any other piece of writing, unless the writer makes an impassioned plea to, "please believe what I'm writing"; they don't tend to here. I don't think that many of the things you say are obvious, even to me. And sure as hell they wouldn't be to someone who didn't have a tulpa. Or do you mean that all of these experiences are reproducible? Because that wouldn't be a very convincing argument to me if I hadn't made tulpas already.


Regarding that, saying that this is a work of fiction seems pretty misleading to me. You don't mean that. You do mean to bear no responsibility for what others do after reading, but that's not really related to whether or not it's fictional. I mean, if I were reading this as an outsider, would I read that and think, "That wacky guy, not trying to make me believe anything", or would I think, "Uh, so, this is made up? Alright then."?


I just think that "no-bullshit" is an odd thing to fixate on, given the content. You write about a fair amount of stuff that isn't found in (other) guides and so on - but it's mostly related to Buddhist practices. For example, you ask readers to adopt the Five Precepts - this is pretty interesting, but surely it can only be "no-bullshit" in the most vacuous of senses.

Link to post
Share on other sites



> But if you're not planning on adding more guide-y elements to it, then okay


Not in the near future. The first revisions were more guide-y. I didn't like them.


> I'm not sure what you mean here; do you mean that you state these things but don't ask others to believe them?


I ask the writers to think and judge the words carefully. Specifically,


> I don't think that many of the things you say are obvious, even to me


is something that I will do my best to improve.


> Or do you mean that all of these experiences are reproducible?


That too, although for this iteration I decided against the "guiding" nature and the exact descriptions on how to reproduce things.


> You don't mean that


I do mean in a fictional sense too. In that the book is pretty much based on empirical knowledge. It reminds me some psychological things we studied years ago, the early materials were pretty empirical at best, going into guesswork. Good fiction makes you think though, the story has a moral. I hope my fiction will make people think about what they plan to do as well.


> surely it can only be "no-bullshit" in the most vacuous of senses.


True. The plan is to further reduce the amount of buddhism references. I'm not perfect, but I have a very clear goal. Wouldn't make much sense to rename the work after I reach it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't had a chance to read this quite yet, but I would like to know from you shinyuu, what is the purpose of this book? Is it to entertain? To teach? What do you want a reader to walk away with when they finish reading?

I don't visit as often as I used to. If you want me to see something, make sure to quote a post of mine or ping me @jean-luc

Link to post
Share on other sites

From me? I barely participated in that work. I think hostey wanted me to write the further part from a tulpa perspective but we never got to it. I did read through the text and I think it's overall right in regards to how I feel about the topic myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, my misunderstanding. I want to know from Farcaller.

I don't visit as often as I used to. If you want me to see something, make sure to quote a post of mine or ping me @jean-luc

Link to post
Share on other sites



Entertain? Barely. My writing style isn't good for entertaining the crowds. Teach? Maybe. That depends on what you want to learn. It's not supposed to teach you how to make tulpas in a way Kiah's guide does. I want people to think more about "why", not "how". All these instatulpas that are gone in a week and communities where it's ok for a tulpa to be a slave, obedient to the will of the host — I find it somewhat unhealthy. Experiments are good, and I got into this community thanks to one. I didn't know what it implied back then. No one told me, how fucking hard it can get at times, not to create a tulpa, but be responsible for a creation of one.


So I just want people to stop and think of that for a little bit. Actually realize what they are getting into. And continue with that knowledge. Or stop there.


This is it, I guess?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Teryakywind
      Teryakywind's Tulpas for Dummies (verified 3/30/21)
      This guide is intended to be a general overview of how to make a tulpa and providing tips to help a fledgeling creator in recognizing responses, a brief overview of the psychological model of tulpas, and a short history of tulpas in the Western world.
      A full glossary probably/maybe/might be added at a later date. Any inquiries about visualization practice, wonderlands, and other forcing-related topics should be covered by any of the multitudes of guides already posted.
      Constructive criticism can be posted here or by contacting me on the IRC.
      Hopefully this doesn't get removed because I'm not sure how submitting this stuff works after GAT was implemented.
      tulpasfordummies.pdf pdf back-up
      tulpasfordummies.docx Word document back-up
    • By Kopase
      I've made a series of video guides over the past several months designed to both improve on other guides by eliminating many less-substantiated forcing techniques and incorporating my research, and to deliver the information in a more comfortable (video) format. For those who cannot view the videos or would prefer to read their transcripts, I have collected their transcripts into a folder of PDFs linked here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1utyb9ZPluPFxPBlR1uYsZGoqTwJ3kDyS?usp=sharing
      Mirror: https://www.dailymotion.com/Tulpa-Guides
      Transcript Back-ups:
      Don't watch the In Detail series without watching the super-compact guide! They are meant to be viewed together!
      The Super Compact 5 Minute Video Guide to Making a Tulpa
      This video alone should give you all the information you need to make a tulpa. It's very compact and goes over the basics without much detail. For an expanded view, continue reading/watching for the In Detail series of videos.
      KISS - Keep it Simple, Stupid
      Over-complicating the forcing process is the easiest way to gimp your progress. This video goes over how to keep your eyes on the prize and avoid ideas that would only waste your time.
      Making a Personality
      Too many guides and people will demonize personality forcing for what are, in my opinion, very weak reasons. Data I've collected in the past suggests that giving your tulpa a starting personality helps them to develop faster, and you also get to have an idea of who you'll have with you for the rest of your life before you start to make them. What many people fail to pick up on is that personality forcing is more about you learning the personality than the tulpa, and that once you have a strong grasp of what you're trying to make, the pieces should fall into place.
      Visualization and Making a Form
      Giving your tulpa a starting form not only makes visualization a more natural process, but also (like personality forcing) can decrease the average time to create a tulpa, according to my data. The easiest way to do this (and, often, personality forcing as well) is to just copy a character you know and like from some kind of media. You should probably stick to something human or personified, though, so that you don't fail to make the mental connection that your tulpa is a person.
      Thinking For Your Tulpa (Parroting etc)
      No, parroting is not bad. In fact, it's among the most useful methods available for many people trying to create tulpas. But, it shouldn't be relied on as a crutch, and this video goes over both how to use parroting in moderation, and how to employ two other tactics that are means to the same end.
      Getting Your First Responses
      The moment you get your first real response from your tulpa is a highly anticipated one, and for good reason! But, avoiding false positives while also staying open for their first true attempts to reach you is no easy task. This video goes over what those initial responses should feel like, and what many people get caught up on.
    • By madrezaan
      For those who understands Russian, there's a guide describing so called "gymnasium student" method of tulpa creation.
      Working link: here
      The main idea is to treat tulpa as your own student in gymnasium. Then to organize all stuff, she got to learn/practice, in 3 levels: grade, disciplines for each grade and topics for each discipline. The whole tulpa's training process is considering as a "game of school", with tests, exams and score system. It is necessary for the tulpa to pass a test in every topic, and to pass exam in every discipline to make a progress. Introduced score system takes a role of feedback, which allows you to put extra flexibility to estimated hours per each topic and discipline.
      Also, an attempt to completely rid off "slaveholder" terminology of "forcing", "host" etc. Instead of that, all process is describing in positive terms of "learning", "teacher" and so on.
      Full English translation is possibly to come in future.
    • By mmbarrios2004
      Sorry if there is already an answer for this.
      My tulpa is quite playful and active. But we don't have many ideas on what to do. We tried to play hide and seek and riddles, but it was very easy for both of us since ... well ... we share the same brain. We want to know what we can entertain ourselves with.
    • By Sungazer
      (I'm new to this forum so I apologize for anything I'm doing wrong)
      When I was around 7 I created myself an imaginary friend out of spite for my mother (NOTE: my mother is a good person and I know spite is a horrible reason to create a tulpa, but I was a kid and barely knew anything). But instead of making a regular imaginary friend, I took my inner voice of common sense and decided to make that my imaginary friend. I gave her a small personality, called her Sarah, and imagined that she lived inside a Pekingese figurine by my bedstand. For the next week or so I would carry that figurine around, and instead of listening to my mother I would ask the statue, "What should I do, Sarah?" I'll then imagine Sarah telling me what the most common-sense-ish (for lack of a better word) thing to do was. After a while I stopped carrying the statue, but Sarah would continue to talk to me.
      Once I reached puberty, I still had Sarah, and like many other imaginary friends who exist for that long, she began to develop some kind of sentience. Instead of only saying what I wanted to hear, she would openly challenge what I was doing if it wasn't the wisest decision. She would instigate conversation independently, comment on others, etc. She even changed her name to Anielka. When I finally learned what tulpas were years later, I realized she fit the definition for a tulpa and/or shard. (I learned that a shard is a sentient consciousness made from your own personality, like how Anielka was made out of my common sense, but I may be wrong).
      Onto the question: Despite the fact that she still has a bit of difficulty speaking in certain areas, when it comes to helping me make a good decision she is incredibly vocal. But sometimes, if I myself think of something common-sense-ish or wise, it'll start off with my mindvoice and my words, but by the end it's entirely Anielka's. Similarly, sometimes when she thinks of something off-topic, it'll start off in her voice and end in mine. I won't be able to tell if I said it, or Anielka (she doesn't know either). I heard of the term "blending" in a couple plurality communities and I think that is the best description of what's happening. But unlike when others describe blending, it's often triggered by an event, but mine happen randomly and quite frequently. It's not frightening in any way, just a little unnerving that most of my own thoughts on the matter somehow turn into hers.
      Is this something I should worry about? Or is it just the nature of a shard, which was formed out of me instead of by me, to do this? Am I mistaking my own thoughts for a tulpa?
      A bit of information if it helps answer the question:
      - I've been diagnosed with Body Dysmorphic Disorder and have a pending diagnosis on ADHD. BDD has intrusive, terrifying thoughts that cause me to worry about how I look obsessively (even if I look normal), and ADHD makes it hard for me to focus for long periods of time. Anielka has been amazing at helping with both. Reminding me nobody judges me for what I look like, helping me to stay on task and celebrating with me when I get something done.
      - Anielka is my only tulpa, though I tried making more.
      - I don't have problems with identity or forget who I am. 
      - I have a strong imagination and there have been times in the past I confused fantasy for reality. It rarely happens anymore, though.
      - I currently have good relations with my mother.
      - I never visualize Anielka. Even after I stopped carrying the dog figurine around, I still believed that was where her "soul" is, and to this day it feels unnatural and mildly distressing for her to imagine her outside of that statue.
  • Create New...