Jump to content

Would Tulpamancy Count As a Religion?

Recommended Posts

Now, now, I know -- coming off a bit strong here, but hear me out.

After writing (not so exactly) an essay about what I have realized about tulpamancy in religion, it made me see everything in a new light. Demonology, Angelology, theology, Goetia, philosophy and paranormal all came together in a mental amalgamation, almost feeling like a sodomic defiling of knowledge, and it made me think.


I'm not saying in the big picture of tulpamancy, or in the case of a cultist type of way, more like a buddhist type of fashion -- would Tulpamancy count as some sort of religion, and not just some practice/medium like Goetia?


Because as a (personal, sole) philosopher and a "creator" of literally three different multiverses, I believe that, since the mind is so powerful, so great and mighty, we connect to a different state of self (our spirit) and through that, it causes ideas to come to life through visualization (forcing, wonderland) and it attaches another spirit (tulpa/guardian/etc) to our spirit, causing pure enmeshment. Through this, (and I use this terminology loosely) we become Gods.


Like I asked, would Tulpamancy count as a type of religion?



Link to post
Share on other sites

Eh, after the last thread with tulpamancy being discussed as a pseudoreligion, this one brings up some strong feelings.


Anyway, the answer is no, it is a subculture. That is the proper categorisation. Religions have religious beliefs.


It is also not a practise, but a collection of things surrounding a practise. It is also not one practise but many variants of one practise.


To understand the difference between a culture and a religion, compare and contrast what it means to be Canadian, and what it means to be Catholic.

Host comments in italics. Tulpa's log. Tulpa's guide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eh, after the last thread with tulpamancy being discussed as a pseudoreligion, this one brings up some strong feelings.


Anyway, the answer is no, it is a subculture. That is the proper categorisation. Religions have religious beliefs.


It is also not a practise, but a collection of things surrounding a practise. It is also not one practise but many variants of one practise.


To understand the difference between a culture and a religion, compare and contrast what it means to be Canadian, and what it means to be Catholic.


I see. However, I've thought some things over when I put in place the idea of God and entities being entities relating to tulpas, and thought about how angels are good because we believe them to be and that demons are evil because we believe them to be, but being put in the perspective of thinking every entity in Christian mythology is good, it makes the illusion of belief that demons are good, and to hypothesize, if someone were to believe this and summon one, it would be good.


I don't endorse rituals or sacrifices, but I have a feeling that the mythological hierarchy of Demons and the demons themselves are only evil because humans think them to be.


Yes, tulpamancy is a subculture that has a collection of ideas surrounding practice. But I believe the qualities of it gather into a pseudoreligion/philosophy that uncovers truths of the human mind and origins. Not to sound cryptic or mystical. Just a theory.



Link to post
Share on other sites

Impossible. To the last person, no one here can agree on said truths. Therefore each person is a religion onto themselves.


The real mystery is how we can work together and collaborate under such complete anarchy.

Host comments in italics. Tulpa's log. Tulpa's guide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on if you consider this stuff fact, or just a possible interpretation of various phenomena. It's certainly not a religion to me, just an organization (of a collection) of ways of thinking. It's like calling baseball a religion because they tell you "rules" you're supposed to believe, and you do... because that organization of ways of thinking creates a game, not because you think those rules are some kind of fact.


That being said, there are some tulpamancers who take what they hear as gospel, and go around considering our equivalent of football players to have incorrect beliefs. But I don't think, at least specifically with "Tulpamancy", there's any real intent of that. So overall I wouldn't call it a religion, even if a small number of people "practice" it like one, or are at least misinformed on the nature of the information involved.

Hi! I'm Lumi, host of Reisen, Tewi, Flandre and Lucilyn.

Everyone deserves to love and be loved. It's human nature.

My tulpas and I have a Q&A thread, which was the first (and largest) of its kind. Feel free to ask us stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In tulpamany they believe they can make one .

But what our opinion about buddahsim tulp creating ( is it science or religion??)

To me tulpa not religion here... its only fact by practice.

Although it has a religious background.

But become a realstic fact.

We should at last can saperet them.

But some tulpa has beliefs such as angel and fairy

In forcing. .so this practice make new path to religions.

Like me I'm making idol god so I can use it as god when it happened.

But still I have first creator. ..my tulpa only will change it later .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given enough time and energy, the universe may keep expanding forever. If it does, new star-systems and planets will continue to form into perpetuity.


This means that, one day, as the mathematical possibilities of how matter can be arranged are exhausted, in some unfathomable number of years in the future, at some unfathomable distance away, there is a small chance that there will exist a world where a perfect replica of your tulpa lives corporeally and biologically...


That counts as an "after-life," right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the universe does keep expanding forever, the heat death of the universe is a necessary consequence of entropy and conservation of energy.


More interesting, the size of the universe is unknown, as there is an observation horizon due to the universe's expanding nature. Therefore the universe could be large enough to include all possible configurations of matter under its physical laws. Consequently I could already exist physically inside this universe at this present time.

Host comments in italics. Tulpa's log. Tulpa's guide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Apollo Fire
      Tulpas: Creation, Sentience, and Vocality
      This guide was written to cover the beginning stages of tulpamancy from creation to vocalization in a way that's useful and comprehensible to someone new to the concept, detailing general guidelines, tips, explanations, and other practical information to help someone beginning their tulpa journey.
      Google Docs light version: link
      Google Docs dark version: link
      File Dropper download link [Broken]
      MediaFire download link [Broken]

      PDF copy: Tulpas Creation, Sentience, and Vocality (Guide).pdf
    • By Kiahdaj
      English Version:
      French Version:
      Italian Version:
      Russian Version:
      Printer-Friendly Version:
      .epub (for eReaders)
      .mobi (also for eReaders)
      English Changelog:
      July 12th, 2013:
      Revised some paragraphs Added "Why Not to Create a tulpa" Added "Emotional Responses" Added "Head Pressure" Added "Creating a Tulpa of an Existing Character, or person" Added "Switching" Added "Forcing Should not be a chore" September 21st, 2013:
      Corrected grammar errors Revised some sections Added "Your Tulpa Should be a Tulpa First, and a Form Second" August 7th, 2016:
      Corrected errors and added slight clarifications throughout August 9th, 2017:
      Pointed link for Oguigi's & Koomer's possession guide to Wayback archive. November 15th, 2020:
      Made it look less disgusting Also removed the table of contents at the top, because apparently Google docs has that built-in now.  
      French Changelog:
      July 27th, 2013:
      Added July 29th, 2013:
      Added permanent link September 8th, 2013:
      Updated (see notes in "French Version:") Changed link November 20th, 2013
      Italian Changelog:
      August 12th, 2013:
      Added August 18th, 2013:
      Changed Link September 12th, 2013:
      Russian Changelog:
      December 19th, 2013
      French Version:
      dragonclaw has kindly taken much time to translate this entire guide into French. Currently, this version contains all sections that can be found in the original English version, but lacks the revisions done to other sections in the past.
      Italian Version:
      This version, translated by the user "dreamy" (you'll always be noobdreamer to me) should currently be up-to-date, besides the most recent English update.
      Russian Version:
      This version of the guide was recently translated by the user Leopold, of his own accord. Much thanks to him for the hard work.
      For all the non-English versions of the guide, note the date of creation in comparison to the latest update of the English version. I will not tell you every time one of the versions is not completely up to date. You can figure that out yourself. If it was not up-to-date when it was posted, I will let you know as I did the French version.
      For those of you who want to translate this guide:
      At least not yet. I should have made serious note of this earlier, but I intend to do some major revisions to this guide, such that any translation done now would be severely outdated by the time I'm finished.
      On top of that, there is also a possibility that this guide may be taken down altogether.
      As always, let me know what you think, and if there are any sections you'd like to see added.
      It's worth noting that I still plan to reword/revise some of the paragraphs. I feel like I didn't get my point across as eloquently as possible. But until then, make do with my rough-draft wording.
    • By Amadeus
      A little while back I was tasked with writing a general overview to tulpae and creation.  The idea was to have an up-to-date general guide that didn't push things like hour counts on new users, talked about different methods, and other such things. 
      Took me about a good number of hours in front of a public computer, but I got a draft finished. 
      So, here it is.  The Word file I typed up originally, and a .txt for people who the Word file doesn't work for. 
      Input would be fantastic.  Constructive criticism is always welcome.
      Latest version.
      Tulpa Phenomenon Overview Guide v1.docx
      Tulpa Phenomenon Overview Guide v1.txt
    • By madrezaan
      For those who understands Russian, there's a guide describing so called "gymnasium student" method of tulpa creation.
      Working link: here
      The main idea is to treat tulpa as your own student in gymnasium. Then to organize all stuff, she got to learn/practice, in 3 levels: grade, disciplines for each grade and topics for each discipline. The whole tulpa's training process is considering as a "game of school", with tests, exams and score system. It is necessary for the tulpa to pass a test in every topic, and to pass exam in every discipline to make a progress. Introduced score system takes a role of feedback, which allows you to put extra flexibility to estimated hours per each topic and discipline.
      Also, an attempt to completely rid off "slaveholder" terminology of "forcing", "host" etc. Instead of that, all process is describing in positive terms of "learning", "teacher" and so on.
      Full English translation is possibly to come in future.
    • By Jamie
      What do you think the ideal experience with tulpamancy is? As in, what all do you hope the tulpamancer gets from the experience? How do you hope their life changes? 
      I would say:

      In general, internal life becomes more meaningful. Lonely hosts get a little less lonely, and the host/tulpa relationship is always evolving and deepening. 
      Mental control is improved: hosts learn to discern their thoughts from their tulpa's and from intrusives, and they learn to quickly and easily dissmiss intrusives, and replace intrusive ideas with more purposeful/mindful ones. 
      Tulpamancy sparks a great introspective time of self-discovery for the host. Switching fronters is a path by which the host sees how much of their behaviors is linked to their beliefs/personality. The tulpa also has access to memories and beliefs that the host may have never shared externally, so conversations may happen on topics that no one has ever had the host think about, before.
      Boredom is a different, easily-defeatable beast. Empty moments waiting in line are filled with lively converstion and company. This is a signifigant improvement in daily life to many. 
      Visualization improves greatly, leading to more enjoyment of reading, and an easier time with a variety of tasks, and again, a more fulfilling internal life. 
      The system flourishes with few heartaches. Number of members stabilizes and everyone is happy with the amount of attention they recieve. 
      Doubts about the reality of a plural experience become fleeting or a thing of the past. The system trusts in the reality of their experiences, even if they aren't easily explainable. 
      Tulpamancy is a life-long commitment: the system will endure and age together. 
      The system forms a unique point-of-view about how some tulpa-related thing works, and comes and shares their opinions and theories with the community ;p

      Happier, healthier, with a more meaningful life. -J
  • Create New...