Guide for New Members

[schlondark]

Disapproved for tulpa guides given that its more of an introductory statement to newer users and is outdated/has a semi-inactive author.

[Guest Anonymous]

CyberD, all of this information appears relevant in today's forum usage. What if anything to you find to be the problem with this new members guide aside from the author being the now gone albatross? The guide is straightforward enough it should leave no questions to be asked.

[CyberD]

Perhaps someone will have a question. Maybe the guide didn't answer it. With a username next to the original post that says admin or staff they know they can click on it and ask someone directly.

 

Of course you didn't need me to tell you that, you should have figured it out on your own.

[Guest Anonymous]

This needs to be updated at the very least. A section about the GAT, update who's on the staff, maybe add in a bit about the site's history, etc.

 

It'd probably be better to just write a new one and sticky it in the new users section. Preferably have an active staff member do it so the new users can put a face to the message instead of the departed Albatross.

 

I'm willing to undertake this provided the GAT agrees that this needs to be done. If so, I'll get drafts up, let you all dissect it, and when it's up to standards move/post it in the New Users section.

[Linkzelda]

I don't mind at all if you'll take the initiative.

[waffles]

I agree. You're welcome to do so. If this newer version is good then this guide is no longer needed.

[Guest Anonymous]

Very well. I'll get started on it, hopefully have something out by Sunday at the earliest.

[Averian]

Disapproved for the guides section.

[waffles]

Guess I'll take this down given that Derp is looking to write a newer version. This could probably still go to a vote if necessary though.