Jump to content

I don’t consider Vee a “tulpa”


Recommended Posts

Just realized that the term is a bastardized cultural appropriation term from Tibet. While I love Tibet, and root for their one day independent state, I cannot, as a white person, say that to describe Vee. I’d rather use the term “thought-form”, and I refer to myself as a parogenic host.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(edited)

There is multiple well laid out arguments against the cultural appropriation concept and most Tibetan Buddhists do not care and have said as much on r/tulpas. 

 

It is mainly pushed by sysmeds as another way to lash out at any non disordered form of plurality. 

 

If you really wanna swap to parogen be my guest but I find the whole reasoning behind dropping the word "tulpa" to be weak. 

 

You might also wanna get over that white guilt there.

Edited by Michael Blackwater

Hi, I'm Michael, I'm a tulpamancer interested in diving as deep as I can into this realm of thoughtforms.

I'm Shade, Michael's first tulpa and girlfriend. I'm fairly reserved but love philosophy and psychonautics. 

I'm Dawn, I'm the most active tulpa in the system and also the most fun loving/party girl type. 

In our system there is also Ember and Spark, Cinderella, Astra, Scarlet, Jade, Rarity, AquaIgnis, Tony, Majima, and Sarah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(edited)

No Buddhist has ever used the term "tulpa". The Tibetan "sprul pa", a type of emanation body, was poorly translated by Alexandra David Néel, so it was a term no one but her had used.

 

If we were going around calling them "sprulpas" or "emanation bodies" then I would absolutely agree it was appropriation, but as it stands, "tulpa" is a vaguely-related new word that's been exclusively used for plurality-type thoughtforms aside from its initial use by Néel. And I don't even really appreciate her own writings on her experience of a "tulpa" in the context of Buddhism, except that she noted it may have been an illusion. Creation of a sprul pa, and eventual recognition that it's no more real or fake than anything else, is just one of countless ways created to help people along towards enlightenment.

 

 

Anyways, the term was just inspired by a concept. It doesn't have to have been "culturally appropriated". I feel like you don't know how many thousands of words in just English were inspired somewhere along their etymology by similarly related-but-disconnected concepts, not meaning or being used for what they were somewhere far back along the line anymore. That's just how language works and evolves.

 

 

And you said you're fine with "Thoughtforms", but for completeness' sake I'd like to cover the related idea of considering "tulpamancy" to be bastardizing the Tibetan Buddhist practice:

 

The term "Tulpa" is used to describe an existing phenomenon, and while many do create them on purpose, the concept didn't arise from bastardizing emanation bodies. My own tulpas were spontaneous natural occurrences created by fixation on characters, with no intent, prior knowledge, or even history of imaginary friends in my childhood on my part. And there are countless cases like ours. It's clearly just a possible natural phenomenon in human brains, that can also be induced purposefully - so I wouldn't call the concept of tulpas bastardized either.

Edited by Luminesce

Hi! I'm Lumi, host of Reisen, Tewi, Flandre and Lucilyn.

Everyone deserves to love and be loved. It's human nature.

My tulpas and I have a Q&A thread, which was the first (and largest) of its kind. Feel free to ask us stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...