Jump to content

ThunderClap's Guide on Tulpa Creation


Recommended Posts

For convenience, use the link below that best suits you for reading.

 

(Update: It has come to my attention that this guide has been archived and uploaded to different sites such as scribd. This is perfectly fine, so thank you for spreading the file. I only ask that you give credit to the author when doing so and not to charge any money for these documents. Thank you.)

 

Audiobook and revision in the works. 

 

PDF Version: https://ia800400.us.archive.org/25/items/TulpaCreationGuide/ThunderclapsTulpaCreationGuide.pdf [Recommended for all purposes!]

 

Kindle (.mobi): https://archive.org/download/TulpaCreationGuide/ThunderclapsTulpaCreationGuide.mobi [Recommended for e-ink displays!]

 

ePub Version: https://archive.org/download/TulpaCreationGuide/ThunderclapsTulpaCreationGuide.epub

 

Plain text: https://archive.org/stream/TulpaCreationGuide/ThunderclapsTulpaCreationGuide_djvu.txt

 

Single page processed jp2 zip: https://archive.org/download/TulpaCreationGuide/ThunderclapsTulpaCreationGuide_jp2.zip

 

Torrent: https://archive.org/download/TulpaCreationGuide/TulpaCreationGuide_archive.torrent

My guide on tulpa creation

 

Please consider making a private grant to tulpa.info to keep the community alive.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Well, not sure how guiding the early, actual guide parts of the guide were, but I gotta say I did like a lot of the latter stuff. I guess there's not that much new at this point when it comes to guides and as doing what one thinks is the best is probably the best way to go at it, guides are going to be less specific if they aim to help as many as possible. You did offer some tips and such, stuff that isn't very new or unique I guess, but again, the stuff that came later I enjoyed more and would be a very important read to many.

 

I do like what you said about hour counts and the whole assuming sentience part. As for the switching section, I think it's pretty clear you avoided saying stuff like "tulpa-like state" or "become a tulpa" for a reason, which is smart. "Front" and "back" also probably refer to how some call it "fronting", but I can't say I really understand the whole front/back distinction you're supposed to be making here. "Switching places with your tulpa" is pretty close to "become the tulpa" in the eyes of some, so if you're planning on doing fixes on this, rewording that a bit might be a good idea.

 

Overall, I think it was a pleasant read with just enough text and a pleasant enough format. I would approve this, though ThunderClap might want to think of the switching part a bit more. Not enough to gain a disapproval in my eyes, but thin ice, you know.

The THE SUBCONCIOUS ochinchin occultists frt.sys (except Roswell because he doesn't want to be a part of it)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that when it comes to catering to many topics, it becomes less specific, but for any creation guide, I mostly see how the person interprets the general information. It's understandable that the underlying concepts will be apparent, but when it comes to newcomers looking at different perspectives, they may be able to see patterns in why individuals would emphasize certain concepts.

 

And when it comes to creation guides, we know there's nothing procedural about it, just a lot of planning, and going at your own pace, and just persevering until breakthroughs are made. There's some form of opinion in any future submission on tulpa creation, but allowing others to get another angle from a person who may think certain concepts are more important (but not the absolute standard or anything) provides a sense of subjectivity.

 

To anyone who's already experienced, we would naturally see the underlying concepts and think of it as the same as any we may garner favoritism over, but I still think having different interpretations is inevitable. As for length, I love seeing a person formatting their way of how one may go about making tulpas, and have no problems if a person makes a longer entry, since that may make it more unique in some way.

 

 

I'll approve for Guides, and newcomers should already know to check other interpretations as well anyway. Unless they're that indolent to look at previous threads and sections of the forum. Oh wait.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Certain of the FAQ section questions don't seems like they shoudl be addressed hear, and I don't think a sweeping calling of x phenomenon "uncredible" is necessary in a guide, but other than that and a few minor personal gripes it seems fine (tulpar)

 

approved for guides.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading it through, it all feels very familiar. At the least, the standard creation stuff is very generic. On the other hand, it's pretty concise and well-presented, and fairly agreeable too.

 

 

Pedantry ho:

 

Visualization is the process of imagining your tulpa in your mind's eye.

Imagining implies mind's eye. What else would you imagine your tulpa in? I have a conviction that if everyone truncated their "let's define visualisation" sentences in their guides to exclude "mind's eye" and all that nonsense then we'd miss out at least 40% of "help how do I visualise" stupidity. Maybe that's not very good critique but it's my advice.

 

This is "self induced schizophrenia!" - No it is not. It is impossible to give yourself something like schizophrenia.

This gets repeated a lot but it's not strictly true. Remember that prolonged use of certain drugs can at least contribute to cases of schizophrenia. And keep in mind that there aren't - as far as I know, at least - any studies of the long term effects of tulpas or something similar.

 

Contrary to popular belief, "hour counting" DOES NOT MEAN literally counting how many hours you have been tulpaforcing. Hour counting is when you expect how long creating your tulpa will take.

I know what you're trying to say here but it doesn't really make sense how you say it. To say that hour counting isn't counting hours seems to be confusing to me. I would rephrase as 'the bad part of hour counting is the expectation'. Or maybe' when people talk about "hour counts are bad" they mean the expectations part of them'.

 

Joe Forcer and the Mystery of the Evil Tulpa!

I don't disagree with the message to treat everything with scepticism, but I don't like how you imply that shocking reports are probably false. In fact, Joe should take the 'internet authorities'' saying that such things don't happen with just as much suspicion. Points for an accurate portrayal of the average tulpamancer though.

 

 

Yeah, that's pretty much it. Reflecting, I can't really think of any particular item that's unique here. I would be approving for the presentation more than anything else if I did, and I will, if you take what I said into consideration and maybe also if you don't.

 

Oh and I saw "tulpar" in there somewhere. You should fix that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Approved, Guides.

 

This is a pretty general FAQ_Man/Irish-style guide. It reads mostly fine and I would feel comfortable recommending it to a newbie that wanted a guide of that style, which was written in more recent times.

 

Most of the contents is agreeable, I was even expecting the guide to skimp on a few important details of the creation process that so many guides skimp on, but it didn't, and that was a positive surprise.

 

The guide itself could of course be improved in many ways (method-wise), as any guide can, but I think that by doing so, it would be a different kind of guide, thus I'll save any recommendations here as they would be unnecessary, even if they can be made: for example, there are more ways to do personality than just trait lists, symbolism (and mentioned a bit later on, parroting).

 

The Narration section is quite good, but yes, fix that "tulpar" typo eventually.

 

As waffles said, the schizophrenia question has some unknowns - there are cases of people who are predisposed to it and using one's imagination or even meditating or drug use could trigger it. I don't think it's something the reader should worry much about - if they have it, they have it, and in the worst case scenario, they'll find out sooner than later, but of course, plain tulpa creation in itself isn't likely to induce it (that said, many would claim that tulpa creation is self-induced multiplicity where some psychiatrists may be tempted to stick a label for some people's tulpas, especially if the relationship between the host and the tulpas aren't ideal).

 

I'm not sure how needed the "Joe Forcer" section is - some people may be more skeptical, while someone else may eat up anything they hear. Overall, I don't think it's a good idea to tell people to expect everyone to be a liar, rather than they may want to take some claims with a grain of salt - the problem with this is that for different people, what makes sense and what doesn't is different. Of course the whole "tulpa wants to kill host" thing is stupid in most circumstances, but there are subtler things which some people may find controversial. Taken to an extreme, one can find people that have been in this community for a year or longer and have yet to achieve much progress and doubt the possibility of this entire process despite still spending a lot of time on it. How much salt one should take with other claims isn't something a guide can easily teach - it takes experience, but of course, simple things as you mentioned *should* be obvious to most people. There's even a related problem with this where someone tells someone else something unfortunate that happened with their tulpa, and now the other person thinks it's the norm and starts expecting their young tulpa to be like that too, and suddenly you now have cases of them experiencing the same trouble - a classical example of "frontloading" - sometimes this may be good and beneficial, other times harmful, and in most cases newbies aren't sufficiently prepared to understand the subtleties and I'm not sure a guide can easily teach it without making things overall worse.

 

 

The Possession and especially the Switching section are not as complete as they could be, but I suppose that's only fair if you haven't worked with your tulpa in that area as much.

 

The Possession section seems to mention DJFlix's "liquid" method and the old body suit/hand glove method. Both are quite symbolic and sometimes possession is simpler for some people and don't require symbolism, bur rather just understanding various concepts such as letting go of control, the tulpa taking control, deep relaxation and so on.

 

The Switching section is quite incomplete and I think you may be frontloading people by saying it's "hard" or "few people did it", when there are cases of people getting it with ease (if not that many). I don't really object to the "back"/"front" terminology borrowed from multiple glossary - it's meant to describe degrees of dissociation or connectedness to the body and the senses. Sometimes the terms are misused, but our current terms for describing degrees of dissociation are very clumsy and I don't mind shorthands as those.

 

 

The Glossary's definitions have a few quirks:

 

Thoughtform refers to "daemons" which are not defined in the glossary - maybe the reader will have to google to find out more?

 

The servitor definition is FAQ_Man's, which is fine and dandy as far as this community goes, but there were various other definitions for that term that came before FAQ_Man's definition and people knowing that definition sometimes use it and clash with people from this community (see: glitchthe3rd's definition of servitor or some of the magick folk's definition of servitor and so on). Personally, I do think this definition is the only one worth keeping for the purposes of the tulpa community, but confusion may be inevitable as older definitions clash.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Approved. Very old school. Very easy to read. No excess of information in any area. Manageable, Organized. Weird glossary, but other than that, I actually really enjoyed this guide.

"Assert the supremacy of your Imaginal acts over facts and put all things in subjection to them... Nothing can take it from but your failure to persist in imagining the ideal realized."

 

-Neville Goddard

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 years later...

I read this back in 2013. I agreed and liked its set out, though for myself. Would have been a good starting place if i had not had a mentor. Awesome work mate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By horsetulpamancer
      used references for both, they look alright in my opinion, colors are sucky due to old pencil crayons.
       


    • By Xenon
      Please note: I welcome comments, questions, etc. but please Private Message me if you have a query! Thank you!!
       
      I'm just your average, everyday, "female" genderfluid person. I'm a spiritual Christian, I like rock 'n' roll, and my favorite animal is a tarantula.
       
      This is basically the notebook I share with my tulpa, Clu. I will write about us, and, sometimes I might let Clu write a little. Welcome to our journal.
       
      Let me start at the beginning. In 2010, a movie called TRON: Legacy came out. I loved it and thought a lot about the characters. Off and on, I would add to and play with a little complex world in my head. I had a crush on Zuse. I also thought CLU 2.0 was a pretty cool character. Let's wind the clocks forward to about 2015. I developed a major crush on a British rock singer. I also began to occasionally hear random voices in my head, and was diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder. I'll leave out the gory details. I took a medication that fixed the 'voices' problem eventually. Still, I would play around with my world (which part of would later become a dreamscape).
       
      Around this time, I discovered tulpa.info. I spent many hours reading guidebooks and such. I was intrigued and badly wanted to create a tulpa, and I knew I could make one. However, I decided not to rush anything, and awaited the right time, bearing in mind everything I'd learned.
       
      As I was building my world these past few years (and had watched original TRON from 1982), I found I had very elaborately expanded on a select group of characters. They were CLU 2.0, Sark, Jarvis, and Portia. I noticed CLU 2.0 was definitely the most developed; he had very far more original personality and traits than observed from the movie. It was also evident that I didn't have a cut-out plan for how the character was supposed to be like. Also, he would do and say things within that small world when I wasn't even thinking. I then remembered what I had read and gathered about tulpas.
       
      Roughly a week ago, I switched medications. I found I could think much more clearly and was in touch with my mind. I realized Clu actually existed; he wasn't an original character, he is a tulpa! I made it a point to handle him some, and a couple of days ago, he started talking to me. Today, we had an amazing day together. 
       
      That's the history, basically.
    • By Abvieon
      Abvieon's Guide to Fast and Effective Tulpa Creation
      Backup link
       
      Creating a tulpa doesn’t have to take a long time, and it doesn’t have to be filled with obstacles.
       
      This guide’s main purpose is to help you create a tulpa relatively quickly while avoiding issues and roadblocks along the way. I have noticed many people giving up or progressing slowly with their tulpa’s development for reasons that can be remedied with just a bit of extra knowledge. My hope is that this guide will help that happen a little less often. 
       
      A large part of what tends to cause slow progress in tulpa creation is incomplete knowledge of what you’re getting yourself into, or not enough preparation. Many people get preoccupied and distracted with things that could have been practiced before starting to create their tulpa, instead of afterwards. You will be encouraged to get some of the hardest parts out of the way before and soon after you start creating your tulpa, rather than stumbling through certain unnecessary aspects of trial and error later on in the process. You will preemptively build a strong mindset and foundation for your tulpa to grow from instead of piecing it together after you’ve already begun trying to get your tulpa to “come to life.” This guide is based on what I’ve learned from my own experiences and about 7 years of observations of what does and doesn’t work well for others.
       
      A few things to keep in mind while reading this guide:
       
      As you could probably tell due to its length, this guide is not for those who are looking for a quick and simple explanation of tulpa creation. It is meant for those who want to learn everything they can and don’t mind a lot of details. But don’t feel like you need to read it all in one go! You might ask “If this is a guide for fast creation, why is it so long? Seems ironic.” The answer is that fast tulpa creation comes with the tradeoff of plenty of preparation and learning beforehand. If you were looking for an easy shortcut, sorry, but this isn’t it.
       
      Make sure you recognize the fact that there is no one universal set of steps required to create a tulpa. It is possible to successfully create a tulpa in several different ways. This guide does not focus on the very broad idea of simply creating a tulpa, but rather creating a tulpa in a way specifically for helping the process to go quickly and avoiding certain things that trip people up. Some of the instructions here are not required in general, instead only important to this particular method. Also, many of the things said here are based on personal opinions, experiences, and theories, so don’t come into this expecting pure objectivity, and recognize that things may work a little differently for you.
       
      Most of this guide will be fairly structured and specific. There are a lot of people who feel lost without a specific framework to follow and this was written with those people in mind. If you are not one of these people and this level of structure is unnecessary for you, don’t feel compelled to follow these steps closely. Just take the bits and pieces that you feel are useful to you and mash them together in any way and any order you’d like.
       
      This guide is newcomer friendly, and will cover information that those new to the concept of tulpas may not yet know. Whether you first learned about tulpas a day ago or a decade ago, you can make use of this guide.
       
      ---
       
      This guide includes information on all of the following topics, and more:
       
      What to consider before creating a tulpa
      Common concerns and fears about tulpas
      How to prepare your mind and life for a tulpa
      Visualisation
      Personality
      Mindscapes/wonderlands
      Narration
      Hypnosis
      Signs of sentience
      Vocality
      What to do if you seem stuck
      Parallel processing
      Possession
      Switching
      Imposition
      Tips for living life as a system
      Abvieon's Guide to Fast and Effective Tulpa Creation (1).docx
    • By ArsenyZvonar
      I had this idea circling in my mind regarding the way tulpamancy experiences are being discussed that I wasn't sure how to express. So generally, the things that we experience can be divided into either events that are certain or those that take a specific place on a spectre. A certain event is something that can be easily put into words, like the lack or presence of something (for example lights on/lights off), but there are also things that can't be, due to their nature, conveniently described with words. As an example, take a person who's being asked what the temperature in the room is like. They can say that it was too warm or that it was too cold, which is something most people will usually agree on. But they can also use the expression that the temperature was "pretty average" or "ok", and here's the problem that comes with it. The temperature that the person in question considers to be "ok" or "average" can be very subjective. And I don't mean the subjectivity of an experience, I mean the subjectivity of concept definition.

      There are words that we use that we don't give much thought, because we tend to assume that their definition is universal. We obviously don't clarify every time wheter our understanding of concepts like "tall" or "wide" match that of a person we talk to. It would simply be too inconvenient, so we instead run with the assumption that our understanding of the concept is the same, deeming it easier to just clarify it should a misunderstanding arise. But I think that this aspect is often being overlooked when people discuss tulpamancy experiences. What I'm getting on here is that possibly a significant portion of doubts that people get to deal with could be attributed to these discrepancies in concepts understanding.

      Here's an example of what I mean. Imagine a person who's trying to help their headmate achieve vocality. They read a guide or maybe a post that describes vocality as essentially a way of communication where one hears their headmate. They associate those words with their understanding of what hearing is and start practicing. They spend a month, two months, three months consistently practicing, and they do achieve certain results, but they never quite get there. They assume that they're doing something wrong or that something wrong is with their headmate. They start doubting. But in fact, they did everything right and had gotten exactly where they should've, it's just that the current way they hear their headmate ended up not matching their expectation of what hearing would work like. It happened both because the guide/post they read didn't describe what hearing a headmate is like, and because they didn't give much thought to where exactly their definition of hearing is on the scale from complete lack of any thoughts and a vivid hallucination that feels completely alien as if it was coming from another person outside their mind.

      From cases like these come questions like "How well can you X" or "What does X feel like". But that's not as much of an issue if they do receive a good answer to their question. The problem here is in that not everyone will ask those questions, and even if they do the answer may introduce even more confusion. Someone might say "I can hear them clearly". Well, what does "clearly" imply in this sentence exactly? Is it supposed to feel slightly muffled, but still be easy enough to make out words? Is it meant to feel like it's coming from inside or from outside? And if neither of these details match does that mean the person is not able to hear their headmate clearly? What if they already achieved the best possible quality, but expect it to be better and think that it's not in fact clear. Because of these discrepancies, someone (person A) may claim they do hear their headmates clearly, because they think that it doesn't get much clearer that that. At the same time, another person (person B) who in fact had gone a lot further than person A may claim that they can't hear their headmates very well, because in their understanding it should be even clearer. This way you end up with a false comparison when person A seems to have better developed skills thatn person B, while in fact it's the complete opposite.

      And it gets the more dangerous the more complex the concept that's being discussed is. There aren't many words that can describe how sentient and independent someone is. Headmates are a relatively novel concept in terms of how we think of them nowadays, and therefore the languages we speak don't really have words that describe how we experience the sentience and independence of someone inside. When we discuss these concepts and how far we've gotten in developing such skills we have to make do with what our language offers. How red is that red exactly? Uh... MiIdly red? Slightly more saturated than regular red? Oh, no, it's not red, it's crimson. Except we don't have crimson, cherry, ruby, scarlet, garnet, and rose words equivalents for describing the concepts of sentience and independence. I think it's a very important thing to keep in mind when judging own progress.

      What do y'all think of this?
    • By ArsenyZvonar
      I had written this note for those who find themselves struggling with procrastination or general lack of motivation when it comes to active forcing and 'mancing practices in general. Not sure what section this should go under, but I myself wouldn't consider it to be a guide hence why I named it the way I did. Critique on this piece is very welcome! I suspect I might've written it with a slightly too confident of an attitude. Same for grammar. I kinda suck at constructing fluently sounding sentences and using commas, haha.

      https://docs.google.com/document/d/15ssfwHz_neK4J2DNWU3_yA-vy7kHkHjnKtFaaY1hUj4/edit?usp=sharing
      Getting There_ A Note on Productivity.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...