ringgggg October 6 Share October 6 I'm not talking about turning it up to the point where it's defeaning, I'm talking about turning it up to where it's scary. You know. D-prime is shrinking as we speak. Official LOTPW leaderboard Our imposition progress report Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TB October 6 Share October 6 (edited) I just realized tachyons mess up my conception of visualizing time dimension and speed The idea of, if you imagine x and y axis for all movement in 3d space and z axis for movement through time, the speed of light is going as fast as you can in 3d space cuz you aren't moving in z axis at all so have the speed of moving in that direction transfered But that is only thing I can imagine as infinite speed and I feel should be like teleporting. I guess it is like infinite speed for you but I still didn't get why time moves for others again. I think someone said why but I don't remember, maybe I didn't understand But also I guess tachyons move in the opposite direction in the z axis, which should subtract speed again, but for some reason is how you start going faster, which I guess should manifest as other people seeing you get to places sooner than light I don't think this way of thinking of it works well. But I suck at searching things so I can't reread previous conversation about it I used to think speed of light was maximum rate universe can transfer information and that was why it was the speed limit. But if tachyons are theorized to exist I guess it isn't the limit. And tachyons are just deaging while zipping around too fast Edited October 6 by TB Creation for creation's sake. More of my drawings Resident Dojikko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ringgggg October 6 Share October 6 (edited) A person that needs to google advanced physics concepts so that he has more conversation starters on hand's love Edited October 6 by ringgggg D-prime is shrinking as we speak. Official LOTPW leaderboard Our imposition progress report Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breloomancer October 6 Share October 6 1 hour ago, TB said: The universe is infinite but also getting bigger? the universe is expanding, but its volume is not increasing, because the addition of a finite number cannot change the value of an infinite number 1 hour ago, TB said: I might have read antimatter, idk the difference and confused them. Maybe still wrong though it is much more understandable why someone might think that antimatter has negative mass, but it most likely has positive mass as well. negative mass particles have never been observed before, and if they existed, they may allow for causality violation and possibly even a violation of the law of conservation of energy, depending on how it works specifically 1 hour ago, TB said: How are things audible at 6%? I have comp on like 70%, speakers like 40%, and YouTube about 40 to 60% to hear anything at comfortable level i usually put everything at 100% volume except for volume settings on the computer itself, which i modulate based on subjective preference. if i'm using my laptop's speakers, then i'll usually have it at ~50%, but the vast majority of the time i am using headphones, and with my headphones 6% is plenty loud for most things 55 minutes ago, ringgggg said: I'm not talking about turning it up to the point where it's defeaning, I'm talking about turning it up to where it's scary. You know. i don't know 46 minutes ago, TB said: I used to think speed of light was maximum rate universe can transfer information and that was why it was the speed limit. But if tachyons are theorized to exist I guess it isn't the limit. And tachyons are just deaging while zipping around too fast no you're pretty much right. tachyons probably don't exist, and if they were discovered to exist, it would require people to rethink a lot of what we thought we knew about the universe 46 minutes ago, TB said: he idea of, if you imagine x and y axis for all movement in 3d space and z axis for movement through time, the speed of light is going as fast as you can in 3d space cuz you aren't moving in z axis at all so have the speed of moving in that direction transfered But that is only thing I can imagine as infinite speed and I feel should be like teleporting. I guess it is like infinite speed for you but I still didn't get why time moves for others again. I think someone said why but I don't remember, maybe I didn't understand the z axis represents your subjective time, so it feels like teleporting. but you intersect with others temporally based on your distance traveled through all dimensions, so the effects of time dilation are cancelled out by the effects of your velocity on relative time 46 minutes ago, TB said: But also I guess tachyons move in the opposite direction in the z axis, which should subtract speed again, but for some reason is how you start going faster, which I guess should manifest as other people seeing you get to places sooner than light admittedly, my understanding of tachyons is fairly surface level, but i think your model here is wrong. a line does not travel on an axis in one direction. to reverse a lines direction would change absolutely nothing about the line. i'm not entirely certain what you're trying to describe with your model, but i am almost positive that you're thinking about it wrong I have a tulpa named Miela who I love very much. How we got here | Share your experimental tulpamancy ideas | My unhinged ramblings "People put quotes in their signatures, right?" -Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurboSimmie October 6 Share October 6 I am awake early today! 😊 Tulpa Wife & Mother! 💚 💍 11.28.21 👶 4.7.23 👗 Simmie's AI Dress-Up! 📷 Phil and Simmie's Photographic Adventures! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a937539 October 6 Share October 6 Good morning Stories, Art and stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luminesce October 6 Share October 6 11 hours ago, TB said: Someone said something about dark matter being negative in mass, I think, too. Idk what that means. 9 hours ago, Breloomancer said: the idea of a particle with negative mass is purely theoretical and has never been observed I literally already explained this just some months ago Dark matter is the theoretical one, an assumption that something must exist to make our expected math of measuring mass in the universe make sense https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter Antimatter is real, it's actual matter that cancels out when touching normal matter, and we have created and observed miniscule amounts of it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter There may even be galaxies composed entirely of antimatter out there However, we've never observed more than a microscopic amount so far Hi! I'm Lumi, host of Reisen, Tewi, Flandre and Lucilyn. Everyone deserves to love and be loved. It's human nature. My tulpas and I have a Q&A thread, which was the first (and largest) of its kind. Feel free to ask us about tulpamancy stuff there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurboSimmie October 6 Share October 6 It looks like it's going to be a very nice day today. 🌞 I was listening to some Beatles this morning, the "naked" versions of songs from Let It Be, so good! 😁💚🎵🎵 Tulpa Wife & Mother! 💚 💍 11.28.21 👶 4.7.23 👗 Simmie's AI Dress-Up! 📷 Phil and Simmie's Photographic Adventures! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breloomancer October 6 Share October 6 1 hour ago, Luminesce said: I literally already explained this just some months ago Dark matter is the theoretical one, an assumption that something must exist to make our expected math of measuring mass in the universe make sense https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter Antimatter is real, it's actual matter that cancels out when touching normal matter, and we have created and observed miniscule amounts of it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter There may even be galaxies composed entirely of antimatter out there However, we've never observed more than a microscopic amount so far dark matter and antimatter are both positive mass. where did you get the idea that both of these things had negative mass? if you're going to say "i already explained this" and link to wikipedia, then i'm going to do the same. read the first sentence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_mass# I have a tulpa named Miela who I love very much. How we got here | Share your experimental tulpamancy ideas | My unhinged ramblings "People put quotes in their signatures, right?" -Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TB October 6 Share October 6 (edited) 6 hours ago, Breloomancer said: dmittedly, my understanding of tachyons is fairly surface level, but i think your model here is wrong. a line does not travel on an axis in one direction. to reverse a lines direction would change absolutely nothing about the line. i'm not entirely certain what you're trying to describe with your model, but i am almost positive that you're thinking about it wrong I meant like, if up was moving forward through time and forward/backwards and left/right was 3d dimensions, you are going more horizontal the faster you go, until moving fully horizontal, and then superluminal you top being at plateau and dip downhill on up and down axis instead of like a hump Except ik they can only go ftl, so they'd been traveling down since the beginning instead of going over a hump to break into the speed, which is another layer of confusion, because if all of future and past is already existing in the time dimension, I don't know how it is differentiated as going backwards. Like a ladder that goes up to a slide is forward in time and the slide going down is backwards in time, except idk what creates a rule that those materials only go through time one way and why you can't go up the actual slide side or how it isn't arbitrary I guess it seems arbitrary when thinking of that space as stuff that already exists and is static and it is only our perception moving through it, whatever that is But if time dimension was empty except for the moment, I can see how something would go the other way as it specially moves through it. I wonder what happens when you collide with something then cuz everything on your layer is moving with you so we'd explode hitting stuff we can't see as multiple stuff suddenly exist in the same space for an instant I also guess with the empty time dimension theory I can kind of understand how someone can lose speed on time dimension due to going faster and still be connected to the rest of time. The shape of the universe moving through time dimension would still be connected, just mishappen, or something. Makes slightly more sense than everyone's past and future existing at the same time yet not going out of sink with every speed difference since now I wouldn't be assuming everyone is looking at the same layer slice of time. Things in time is just curved I guess and we see through the flat w axis shape. Or whatever time axis is. Idk I feel like if someone got nuked by a tachyons it would hurt no one other than the person who was in the right place and time, and if you were lagging behind the rest due to high speed, you'd be in danger of blowing up if you stood where they stood at some specific time in the future cuz by then the tachyons has moved to your coordinate Well that'd only apply to a tachyons going straight down anyway, which I guess is infinite speed even though that would be totally stationary in this conception So oops idk, but the mishappen time layer idea makes sense to me 6 hours ago, Breloomancer said: z axis represents your subjective time, so it feels like teleporting. but you intersect with others temporally based on your distance traveled through all dimensions, so the effects of time dilation are cancelled out by the effects of your velocity on relative time This paragraph is what made me see it this way 2 hours ago, Luminesce said: literally already explained this just some months ago I mean I thought I mentioned in my post some things seem like they were explained earlier but I know I didn't remember and searching for things on this site is useless. Not like I've been studying for the test. I didn't remember whether or not the comment I read an hour earlier about negative mass objects was talking about dark matter or anti matter lol Though idk what you're meaning to say. If you're implying we know antimatter has positive mass since we've seen it and that it's have to be dark matter since it is theoretical? Idk if negative mass pushes stuff instead of pulls, and the unexplained movement we see is matter being pushed instead of attracted? Idk I haven't read links yet and just now saw bre's new post. I just got up Apparently there is no ordinary energy in the universe lol, unless it is in the 5% of normal matter number Idek how you can calculate movement of galaxies and stuff to discover this from a microscopic human observation that has had like no time for changes that far away to be noticeable Gravity always shown as an impression in space that pulls things in. The opposite, something pulling up on the cloth of space to make things roll away seems like it ought to exist. I guess that is what anti gravity is Physics and astrophysics is such a huge subject, idk how it is even studied Just thought if tachyons began at same time as Big bang, they could have just gone down from the beginning and I guess the 4d shape is immensely warped in shape stretching in opposite directions I wonder if 5th dimension could be where making other choices comes in, but with warped shape idea idk if it is necessary Edited October 6 by TB Creation for creation's sake. More of my drawings Resident Dojikko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.