Jump to content

[Game] Last one to post wins!


Pleeb

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Breloomancer said:

dark matter and antimatter are both positive mass. where did you get the idea that both of these things had negative mass?

 

I never said dark matter has negative mass, TB said that

 

For antimatter.. I guess I don't know the difference in being literally-so-negative-it-deletes-matter, and having "negative mass". I guess negative mass is a silly concept like "there's existing, and not existing, but what if there was NEGATIVE existence???", which doesn't make any sense at all

 

I'm not the one who brought up that nonsensical concept though, negative matter still exists

Hi! I'm Lumi, host of Reisen, Tewi, Flandre and Lucilyn.

Everyone deserves to love and be loved. It's human nature.

My tulpas and I have a Q&A thread, which was the first (and largest) of its kind. Feel free to ask us about tulpamancy stuff there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 168.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Breloomancer

    33520

  • TB

    15829

  • Luminesce

    9390

  • Ice909

    9367

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

1 hour ago, TB said:

I meant like, if up was moving forward through time and forward/backwards and left/right was 3d dimensions, you are going more horizontal the faster you go, until moving fully horizontal, and then superluminal you top being at plateau and dip downhill on up and down axis instead of like a hump

that could just as easily describe matter/antimatter annihilation

 

your model works fine for when relative time is a function of subjective time, but that stops being the case with matter that has non-positive mass

 

15 minutes ago, Luminesce said:

I never said dark matter has negative mass, TB said that

then i'm not certain what your meaning is

 

16 minutes ago, Luminesce said:

For antimatter.. I guess I don't know the difference in being literally-so-negative-it-deletes-matter, and having "negative mass". I guess negative mass is a silly concept like "there's existing, and not existing, but what if there was NEGATIVE existence???", which doesn't make any sense at all

negative mass would mainly have implications on a particle's inertia and how it interacts with gravity. it's much less counterintuitive than the idea of negative existence. although nonetheless, antiparticles of particles with positive mass also have positive mass

 

22 minutes ago, Luminesce said:

negative matter still exists

in what i have seen "negative mass" and "negative matter" are used synchronously. if that is not how you are using it, what do you mean by "negative matter"?

I have a tulpa named Miela who I love very much.

 

 
"People put quotes in their signatures, right?"

-Me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like adding a negative number to a positive number, pretty simple

Hi! I'm Lumi, host of Reisen, Tewi, Flandre and Lucilyn.

Everyone deserves to love and be loved. It's human nature.

My tulpas and I have a Q&A thread, which was the first (and largest) of its kind. Feel free to ask us about tulpamancy stuff there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(edited)

To make things even more confusing in the negative mass, negative matter discussion, I guess tachyons don't have negative mass, they have negative mass squared, which means that have imaginary mass. According to google anyway. If they exist anyway, but still I guess that is how they work in the math equations they are used in or whatever. I wasn't sure if negative mass and imaginary mass were the same but I guess they are not

 

scientists making things up for days

 

lol reading people with degree in physics saying they have trouble understanding it so I'm not going to feel bad that I don't get it

Edited by TB

Creation for creation's sake.

 

More of my drawings

 

Resident Dojikko

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(edited)
38 minutes ago, Breloomancer said:

huh?? what positive number do you add the negative number to?

 

Antimatter cancels out "normal" matter

 

Adding -5 to 5

 

(But you could also say antimatter is just matter and what we know as matter is antimatter, I think)

Edited by Luminesce

Hi! I'm Lumi, host of Reisen, Tewi, Flandre and Lucilyn.

Everyone deserves to love and be loved. It's human nature.

My tulpas and I have a Q&A thread, which was the first (and largest) of its kind. Feel free to ask us about tulpamancy stuff there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, TB said:

lol reading people with degree in physics saying they have trouble understanding it

A concept's fathomability is measured by how easy it is to visualize

 

1 hour ago, Luminesce said:

I guess negative mass is a silly concept like "there's existing, and not existing, but what if there was NEGATIVE existence???", which doesn't make any sense at all

I think you could use a better analogy. Existence is an idea, as opposed to being material, so of course it wouldn't make sense if you tried to apply a numerical value to it. It'd be like adding one to addition

D-prime is shrinking as we speak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Luminesce said:

Antimatter cancels out "normal" matter

 

Adding -5 to 5

 

(But you could also say antimatter is just matter and what we know as matter is antimatter, I think)

ok, i had just never heard of antimatter called "negative matter" before

I have a tulpa named Miela who I love very much.

 

 
"People put quotes in their signatures, right?"

-Me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just the most obvious go-to analogy, I don't know why anyone wouldn't

 

We all took 5th grade math right?

Hi! I'm Lumi, host of Reisen, Tewi, Flandre and Lucilyn.

Everyone deserves to love and be loved. It's human nature.

My tulpas and I have a Q&A thread, which was the first (and largest) of its kind. Feel free to ask us about tulpamancy stuff there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

because usually negative matter means matter with negative mass. and because both antiparticles and their normal counterparts have positive energy, so saying, for instance, one electron plus one positron equals zero is a bit misleading, because the annihilation conserves the total energy of the equation, it just converts it to another form, like, in this case, two photons

I have a tulpa named Miela who I love very much.

 

 
"People put quotes in their signatures, right?"

-Me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...