Fede-lasse

Fede's Ultimate Superior Tulpa Guide

Recommended Posts

I just wanted to point out that maybe pointing out the chest is a tad unsubtle

 

you're a perv, the chest is just a part of the body (he could've said torso but that's unnecessary to change)

 

anyways I actually read the guide, aaand

 

it seems pretty much perfect, minus a couple things depending (you guys are overstating the "lack of/belief in tulpa sentience" part I think): "Create a backstory"/believing your tulpa exists when you aren't thinking of them is a super.. not-loved thing in the community these days, and it led to a lot of problems when it came to discussing how tulpas actually worked back in the day. The belief implanting section was kinda weird and not something that ever caught on unlike a lot of the rest of the guide.. Also, visualization and imposition are 200% mixed together in his guide, which would be bad (along with some other stuff in it) for people who intend to be part of this community

 

but that leads me to how I feel about this guide - if you separate it from the community, like as something people just find on the internet who don't want to get involved with a whole community for tulpas and really just want to make one, this guide is basically perfect, like it covers so many good things for such an old guide in that scenario

 

buuut, y'know, lots of what it said has been rounded out by the community over the years and so outside of finding this guide and nothing else on its own, I think it's a tiny bit dangerous to be having in our approved guides section without a warning that it's heckin' old and some people disagree with parts of it

 

... it's, apparently already in the approved guides section, so uhh.. it would've been best not to bump it in the first place I think, but anyways it's a solid heckin' guide from not just a "skeptic" view but a "totally know nothing about tulpamancy or plurality communities in general" one, which I mean if we're hosting here on the forum is obviously not the intended audience right?

 

I dunno, as long as anyone that finds it realizes it's super old and from a time when the tulpa community was still heavily debating what tulpas even are, I think it's good enough, certainly interesting to have to look back at!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.