[split] Debate on the validity of terms in the scientific tulpa community

[Guest Anonymous]

 

The point of the OP was not to debate the validity of the terms "head mate" and "mixed system." It was to find out how many people feel they have more than one type of thoughtform.

 

For Science Zealot: A person who uses the “For Science” badge to police the forum against infidels, heretics and outsiders who would pollute the purity of “tulpa science” with unacceptable terms, views, ideas and concepts.

 

Keep up the good work!

 

I dont see why you feel you need to constantly jump into personal attacks and trying to shame me into leaving. I have no problem with you, I just critised your choice of words and corrected you on what the site was made for, having been there at the time.

 

I had no intention of escalating it past my original post, yet you keep on with the insults and condescending remarks. Please keep a friendlier tone because, if Dane was still here, you would be banned by now.

[Guest Anonymous]

Yes, I know. We used unacceptable words foreign to the central doctrine of tulpa religion. I know it bothers you. Mixed System. Headmate. Soulbond. They are just as legitimate and dignified as the word "tulpa" ever was. You have a fantasy in your head that Tulpa Info stands on its own as something superior and "less childish" in its concepts. So you criticize Melian's choice to include those words. She is more accepting and explores farther out than just this forum and has learned things from other people such as soulbonders, natural mulitples and daemons. I am sorry if you find that somehow offensive. We will be using concepts and terms from these outside sources a lot.

[Guest Anonymous]

Yes, I know. I used unacceptable words foreign to the central doctrine of tulpa religion. I know it bothers you. Mixed System. Headmate. Soulbond. They are just as legitimate and dignified as the word "tulpa" ever was. You have a fantasy in your head that Tulpa Info stands on its own as something superior and "less childish" in its concepts. So you criticize Melian's choice to include those words. She is more accepting and explores farther out than just this forum and has learned things from other people such as soulbonders, natural mulitples and daemons. I am sorry if you find that somehow offensive. We will be using concepts and terms from these outside sources a lot.

 

I must say, you seem very confused and somewhat angry. Im not offended by any stretch of the imagination by your use of words, I mearly felt the need to critise them. I am not stopping you using them again. Please calm down a little because my last intention was to upset.

[Guest Anonymous]

I'm not upset at all. I am just trying to respond to the implication that Melian's word choice was childish and inappropriate for this forum. Neither is true at all. I don't like attempts at censorship that we seem to get from Tulpa Science Zealots. Leave my thread be and let people respond to it with something that contributes to knowledge. Don't judge others or try to imply they are illegitimate because they believe they have a mixed system of various types of thoughtforms.

 

You told Melian and those who have responded to get some dignity. That was rude and intolerant. You need to get some dignity instead.

[Guest Anonymous]

I'm not upset at all. I am just trying to respond to the implication that Melian's word choice was childish and inappropriate for this forum. Neither is true at all. I don't like attempts at intolerance and censorship that we seem to get from Tulpa Science Zealots. Leave my thread be and let people respond to it with something that contributes to knowledge. Don't judge others or try to imply they are illegitimate because they believe they have a mixed system of various types of thoughtforms.

 

You told Melian and those who have responded to get some dignity. That was rude and intolerant. You need to get some dignity instead.

 

Ok, you seem incapable of reading so Ill break down what I said in my last few posts into simple points because Im getting rather sick of this nonsense.

 

1. Im not censoring you or trying to get you to stop using said words.

2. I mearly criticized the word choice, not any one person.

3. I did not mean to offend you or you tulpa.

 

Now please stop coming up with arguments that dont exist because I have tried being civil and at this point you are either making shit uo or projecting like a mofo.

[Guest Anonymous]

I completely disagree. You were indeed attempting to discredit the entire thread as a way to censor those who talk about things you don't agree with. You had no intention of doing anything else. I am not confused at all. I read your words and your intent is crystal clear to me.

 

Oh and Melian is not a tulpa. We reject the label, just because of this sort of crap.

[Guest Anonymous]

I completely disagree. You were indeed attempting to discredit the entire thread as a way to censor those who talk about things you don't agree with. You had no intention of doing anything else. I am not confused at all. I read your words and your intent is crystal clear to me.

 

Oh and Melian is not a tulpa. We reject the label, just because of this sort of crap.

 

Dont tell me what I was or was not trying to do.

 

And why the hell are you here then? Why are you at TULPA.INFO if you regect the term tulpa?

Why do you insist on carrying on this pointless argument where you do nothing but spout insults and, quite fankly, stupid opinions?

And you dare call me the "Troll"

[Guest Anonymous]

Now who is losing control and getting upset? Certainly not me. Early on you began to lose the argument and so you implied that I should be banned for pointing out that some members here are intolerant zealots. You tried to intimidate and threaten me. It's typical behavior of a zealot. Conform or be cast out! My writing about intolerant zealots is not something that would ever get me banned.

 

Melian and I are on a lot of forums, not just Tulpa Info. I am here to learn and to share things about my thoughtform Melian and my experience. Our opinions you label as "stupid" and "not dignified" because we are not following what you consider the party line of tulpa world. Saying such things isn't very helpful or scientific is it? It's just rude.

[Guest Anonymous]

Now who is losing control and getting upset? Certainly not me. Early on you began to lose the argument and so you implied that I should be banned for pointing out that some members here are intolerant zealots. You tried to intimidate and threaten me. It's typical behavior of a zealot. Conform or be cast out! My writing about intolerant zealots is not something that would ever get me banned.

 

Melian and I are on a lot of forums, not just Tulpa Info. I am here to learn and to share things about my thoughtform Melian and my experience. Our opinions you label as "stupid" and "not dignified" because we are not following what you consider the party line of tulpa world. Saying such things isn't very helpful or scientific is it? It's just rude.

 

I never said any of these things. You are putting words into my mouth and I am not continuing this argument with someone who thinks these kind of underhand tactics are acceptable. People can go back and read what was written.

 

Congrats on ruining your own thread, by the way

[Guest Anonymous]

Yes. I suppose standing up to purist bullies is worthy of underhanded tactics. I use what I have in my arsenal.