Google Glass expiriment

[Guest Anonymous]

Anyone here who has a google glass, can you use the google glass to videotape your tulpa dancing or something and play it back? If you can, do you still see your tulpa when watching the footage? If so, post it on youtube pleeeeease!

[Charles]

For the most part, people with a fully imposed tulpa are able to see them in pictures. I haven't heard video specifically mentioned, but I would assume the same applies (though the complexity might be an issue if you revisited it after a few weeks). No one else would be able to see it of course, so there wouldn't be much point to uploading to youtube.

[Guest Anonymous]

Dangit...

[Pronas]

only person i know who took a picture of his tulpa and saw her on the photo is irish. and he was trolling, so yeah, i dont even know if its possible fo see your tulpa in a photo

[Chupi]

only person i know who took a picture of his tulpa and saw her on the photo is irish. and he was trolling, so yeah, i dont even know if its possible fo see your tulpa in a photo

 

Seems this should be possible. I'm not sure whether the result would be a static image, a slightly interactive moving image (like the paintings in Harry Potter), or more like the actual tulpa entering a picture and moving around there.

 

Either way, it will obviously only be visible to you; though you could trace the picture rather easily.

[Guest Anonymous]

Okay, dangit.......

[Squir]

Your Tulpa is in your mind, while video/photo are physical data completely separate from your brain. Logically, when you look at the photo/video, your Tulpa would have to "pretend" they're still in the picture by re-enacting what they were doing when the video/photo was taken.

 

At least until we can hook our brains directly to cameras.

[QB2]

I only have one picture "of" QB, and while I can see him in it, there does appear to be effort involved. If I'm really tired and not sure what I'm looking at immediately, he doesn't show up right away.

If I had an entire album of pictures of him in different poses, most of them probably "wouldn't work" because I wouldn't be able to remember what pose he was in when I took them.

Or maybe, like Chupi touched on, my brain would replace them with Harry Potter-style moving pictures that convey QB's general movements and attitude of the time I took it?

I don't know.

I suppose it really depends on how I choose to see it, since it's all purely mental.

[Chupi]

If you're going to photograph your tulpa, it would probably work better if you include yourself in the picture, and do something with your pose that hints at the tulpa's pose. This would get rid of the 'can't remember' issue.