Bambi August 21, 2015 August 21, 2015 :D I was wondering if I was going to have to mention that. Yes, I might be lying. I have absolutely no desire, need or pretense to do so. I don't need to prove anything to anyone. It is just my experience. I have theorized long and hard over it. Off the top of my head, scientifically I can only surmise that the micro tubules or perhaps the dorsolateral-temporal junction achieved a state of entanglement with my friends mind. We don't know a lot about the mind and I keep mine open. I think the hyper skeptics are just ignorant. As I said, we don't know a lot about the mind. Things happen that we cannot explain. Calling an experience into question when you know almost nothing about the mind to begin with is counter productive. It is all part of experimenting. DARPA is working on transmitting images between a control and viewers through the mind and they have been having success. Is it plausible? Well, the governments have sinking a lot of money into such things for a long time and have had results. So, possible. Once again, comparatively we know nothing about the mind. We don't even know how memories are stored, we can only theorize. Just please remember that even though you might be into science (as I am) there will be situations where some people state something and take it on faith, as one might say. Nobody has the right to make demands over it. Take it at face value. It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -Aristotle I have EEG results which show me to be in a dreamless, thoughtless state while I actively force. You could say I wasn't in my mind at the time. The hospital thought I was in deep sleep. Take the claim with a grain of salt, it is true. But I certainly won't be handing over EEG's to prove myself to anyone. If you don't believe me, that's perfectly fine with me. You might see the "community" as being dedicated to science.. but if you look at the top of this page, you will see that this is for metaphysics. Perhaps it is important for you to remember that. Anyway, thank you for not being a jerk over it. It's nice to see. Maybe I should explain what I meant? XD The user alexmmorrow said, "I also have a proof because we were in the same room and he explained everything he saw like a pine forest, river, boat, even my tulpa." So everything in my post was written in reference to theirs. I'm sorry, it's my own fault for not being specific in my original response. ^^ (And, just to clarify further, the reason why I talked about science at all was because they said they have proof. It's perfectly fine to talk about things "of this nature," but I think that having proof of something like this would be a wonderful thing and not to be thrown around as lightly as it was just then, if that even makes sense.) James: Hello, all!
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.