FAQ man May 7, 2012 May 7, 2012 I think we needed a topic-less thread about tulpae. No, this isn't the chat thread, this is more or less a thread to just post whatever tulpa-related shit you want to, that may not require its own thread, I guess. Now if I can only figure out how to pin it...
Orq9000 May 7, 2012 May 7, 2012 So, let me start like this. (...) I have one completed tulpa and one who is slowly but surely being imposed. (...) FAQ. While You were working on Your second Tulpa, did first one participated in the proces of creation? Not really? He encouraged it, and he wanted it to happen but he didn't really help at all. We both agreed on the form and name. So, this was You decision, right? I mean, do You think this is posible, to make second one together with first?
FAQ man May 7, 2012 Author May 7, 2012 Yes it was my decision. I generally don't let my tulpa affect my decisions too much as a whole just because I feel like being dependent on something else (even if it is in my mind) to make a choice isn't the best thing. Hmm. This is a tough question just because you have two consciousnesses that can both see the same thing and be working on the same thing. But maybe deviation would still be happening independently? I'm not sure. Too many variables, really. Would have to be something to test.
Orq9000 May 7, 2012 May 7, 2012 This is a tough question just because you have two consciousnesses that can both see the same thing and be working on the same thing. By this, You mean You and your's first tulpa? By this, You mean potential host and his first tulpa? But maybe deviation would still be happening independently? I'm not sure. Too many variables' date=' really. Would have to be something to test.[/quote'] I wonder, what threat this create? Wouldn't it create kind of 'siamese tulpae' that would be so similiar, they would talk and do same things, same time? And won't it be tulpa, of a tulpa, of a tulpa...
FAQ man May 7, 2012 Author May 7, 2012 Trying to be patient here, because I don't take lightly to people not understanding simple English. By that I meant the hypothetical person and their hypothetical tulpa. I already told yoy quite clearly that my tulpa was in no way involved with the creation process. You should know that a tulpa and a person are seeing the same stimuli no matter what it is. Unless I say specifically that something is in relation to me, than it is not. Is that clear? And I have no idea what you are even trying to say in that second paragraph.
Orq9000 May 7, 2012 May 7, 2012 Trying to be patient here' date=' because I don't take lightly to people not understanding simple English.[/quote'] Poland. Well known for plumbers, not english speakers. I'm still learning this language. By that I meant the hypothetical person and their hypothetical tulpa. I already told yoy quite clearly that my tulpa was in no way involved with the creation process. (...) Unless I say specifically that something is in relation to me' date=' than it is not. Is that clear?[/quote'] Really sorry about this. I should write "potential host and his first tulpa". My bad. And I have no idea what you are even trying to say in that second paragraph. I'll try to elaborate what I mean. If someone works on second tulpa like You did, only agreeing on some things like form and name, this second one is completely his own. But if he allows other consciousness to work with him, it's a little bid like group tulpaforcing, but not making instances of similar tulpae, but really sharing one. And I wonder how this will end. Whose this second tulpa would really be? And is there any danger in creating it this way? Fore example, maybe this will make deviadion follow same trails as first tulpa. And we'll get twins like those from Kubrick's The Shining who constantly acts and speaks same way. Or maybe second one will be subject of first one.
Charlotte May 8, 2012 May 8, 2012 I forgot something I've been meaning to ask I'm near sighted but never use my glasses Should I use them when I get far enough to start imposing or just go without them? I mean can doing one or other fuck this up or what? I have no clue how to think of it. This hot empty painting should be locked and towed.
Guest May 8, 2012 May 8, 2012 I forgot something I've been meaning to ask I'm near sighted but never use my glasses Should I use them when I get far enough to start imposing or just go without them? I mean can doing one or other fuck this up or what? I have no clue how to think of it. I'm a bit near sighted myself. I think it would be really cool if my tulpa looked surreal enough - with more details being visible than normal (without glasses). It would look surreal for me either way, it's appearance is 2D-styled.
Graywolf May 9, 2012 May 9, 2012 I forgot something I've been meaning to ask I'm near sighted but never use my glasses Should I use them when I get far enough to start imposing or just go without them? I mean can doing one or other fuck this up or what? I have no clue how to think of it. Oh wow, I never thought of this. I am very nearsighted and must use glasses. It would be awesome if Brook would stay in focus when I take my glasses off. Something to experiment with, I suppose. Tulpa: Brook Stage: We're back at the beginning
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.