Could tulpas be linked to paranormal activity.

[Comm Data]

I have been pondering this subject for sometime. Im also new here on the site so please forgive me if I offend anybody. What I mean about said tulpa being linked to paranormal occurences is that experiences people have. I am a scientist first and foremost and tulpas is something I recently have gotten into. I however always keep a open mind so I may not deny anything that might have been real. From what I know there has been evidence that people leave behind certain signatures upon death via the brain now these are not ghost but can be seen as them. The signatures can create images of the dead person and other things certain people have more sensitivity to this then others. These people could be addressed as mediums and such. Now what interest me is tulpas possess the same principle for them being around you intense thought and such must be applied to the brain. A signature of a dead person relies on the brains thoughts being deep rooted in what area the said haunting may appear. Now if we think this on tulpas they do let out brain waves as well when you think of them. Then in that case if a person dies that has a tulpa isnt their a way for the tulpa to be eyched on the area thus creating a so called ghost. I await what you think.

[Flexionsensor]

[align=center]

[/align]

Okay, in basic theory, this has a logical consistency. However, I'd like to see this evidence you speak of. I'd also like to see how brainwaves reach other individuals, but beggars can't be choosers.

 

Even so, this would probably only operate if tulpae were operating under Delusion Theory; where the tulpa is a product of the imagination and not a separate consciousness.

 

If this was a legitimate effect (I have doubts due to the lack of empiricism in modern day news/studies,) then it might prove Delusion Theory, and that's interesting, but unless you can supply this evidence, this thread probably belongs in the meta board.

[Comm Data]

Sorry I never stated that I believe in the delusion effect at least until I see evidence. However in UNT college I heard about it from a professor. Im not asking you to believe in it moreover im neutral on the idea myself. Which is why I put the thread on here. So somebody can offer me a factual view since im busy working on other things. Thank you for the reply.

[Dr. Faust]

I'm not sure of how brain waves work but I'd like to think that the creation of tulpa and the creation of one's own consciousness isn't too different meaning that you (or your self- identity rather) and your tulpa are very similar with the exceptions of what you both control as many tulpa have to work to attain physical control of the body.

 

If there is a way for a person to become a ghost I wouldn't doubt a tulpa could similarly become a ghost.

 

However, I have no true understanding of what's going on with brainwaves or anything so don't take what I say too seriously

[Chupi]

What is the evidence of this signature left behind upon death, tied to a location?

 

If this does work how you say it does, and a dying person who has a tulpa leaves behind the signatures for both the host and the tulpa, I would think that supports the separate consciousness theory, not the delusion theory. Both leaving a signature would be evidence for the idea that host and tulpa minds are the same in kind. If the host mind left a signature and the tulpa did not, or they left ones of different sorts, that would be evidence that they're different sorts of beings.

 

Also, moving this to the meta board because >paranormal. Leaving redirect for a while so people can find it.

[Enoch327]

Google the curse of Little Bastard. That was the car James Dean died in. Supposedly it took on some of his energy as he died. Supposedly the curse affected several people until the car "disappeared". Chilling to say the least.

[Hornets]

Tulpas are much like all these supposed majikks in the world: a figment of your imagination. Everyone has a different understanding of things that happen in the world, but most of the time people will believe anything and everything they supposedly see themselves.

Tulpas are not magical. They are not paranormal. If you went to a medium or a paranormal person, they wouldn't "detect" the tulpa because they can't. There's nothing magical about them. As stated above, tulpas definitely fit into the area of the Delusion Theory.

[Dr. Faust]

Tulpas are much like all these supposed majikks in the world: a figment of your imagination. Everyone has a different understanding of things that happen in the world, but most of the time people will believe anything and everything they supposedly see themselves.

Tulpas are not magical. They are not paranormal. If you went to a medium or a paranormal person, they wouldn't "detect" the tulpa because they can't. There's nothing magical about them. As stated above, tulpas definitely fit into the area of the Delusion Theory.

 

I would say that perhaps it is possible to pass on thoughts just by the sheer strength of the thought, albeit kind of weakly.

 

I refer you to thus:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing

 

I know that nothing useful has come of many of the studies, but I think it only because humans really aren't meant to function as wifi networks. Although, I would agree with you very much that Tulpa are figments of our imagination, I would wager there is something very magical about the imagination (however cheesy that sounds).

 

The only problem is that I don't think the things we are discussing have been proven empirically nor do I think they will be so the burden of proof does remain on us to show that remote viewing, mediums, and clairvoyants can see tulpa but because we haven't proven it doesn't mean you can just say it isn't possible.

 

However, I think even tulpa remain on the fringes on science and the edges of our knowledge so I think you could temporarily excuse our more fantastical leanings.