Another person's tulpa going into your mind?

[Signet]

Fascinating stuff. I wish this community was more open to the inexplicable. An experience is an experience. There's no harm in open conjecture.

 

Yeah, after lurking for a bit I've found it odd that the section of this forum dedicated to that sort of stuff gets less attention than the one on Dreamviews.

I mean.. come on. It's a forum about tulpae. You'd think that it's Meta board would get a lot more attention for the size of the forum than the only scientific web-community about lucid dreams. :P

[left blank]

Yeah, after lurking for a bit I've found it odd that the section of this forum dedicated to that sort of stuff gets less attention than the one on Dreamviews.

 

I think I'm part of the minority who feels parapsychology is a valuable area of scientific research.

 

However, I'm not inclined to entertain most metaphysical ideologies. I can understand why magick and other ritual practices aren't taken seriously here. But telepathy and precognition are relegated to the same category as demonology, which I feel is a judgment in error.

 

And then outlandish myths and unconfirmed claims keep circulating (generally) uncontested while the possibility that people can share feelings, symbols, concepts and tulpas remotely without technical aid is reflexively shunned.

 

Tulpas are largely uncharted territory. Similarly, there have been no reliable conclusions made about the non-existence of so-called ESP. The jury's still out. I bet if people decided to use their tulpas for remote viewing, they'd be surprised by the results.

[Nobillis]

I bet if people decided to use their tulpas for remote viewing, they'd be surprised by the results.

 

Kevin (a human) says: "A funny thing happened the other day with Nobillis. We were out in the country and she wandered off into a field (as she often does), when suddenly she pointed and said 'Hey, there's a building over there'. I was skeptical, as I couldn't see a building from where I was. Later when I moved down the road more, it turned out there was a [large] building right where she'd said it was and pointed to. I've no idea how she knew it was there, as I'd never been to that place before.

 

This is about the forth time she has told me about things which I didn't see and wasn't aware of (only to have it confirmed later). Whatever sense she is using, I have no idea. For her it is just what she 'sees', so she doesn't know how either. We suspect she is picking up on clues I am missing consciously."

[Yori]

Interesting. Are there any times that you are 100% sure you can't have seen anything even for a second, out of the corner of your eye? Like, say a big dog was forcing itself on your right side and his paw was on your head, so you could only see the left side for the past 5 minutes, and nobillis was looking to the right, and 3 minutes in that 5 minutes, she spotted something you couldn't possibly see? :D

[Enoch327]

Some of the first tulpas were "watchers". I think egregore is the term. They were designed to go places and see things and report back. So try some experiments. Send your tulpa into a place your are about to enter and have it give you a report. You might be amazed and have all the proof you need.

[left blank]

Interesting. Are there any times that you are 100% sure you can't have seen anything even for a second, out of the corner of your eye?

 

I'm not answering for Kevin/Nobilis, but I wanted to pipe up to say that I've experienced tulpa-mediated remote viewing events where I was entirely sure I couldn't have observed the scene firsthand through ordinary means. In many cases, I was removed from the activity by no less than 700 miles.

 

Unfortunately, I can only offer anecdotes and an armful of witnesses who'd very likely confirm my claims, but I'd be willing to put it the test again. Like Enoch said...

 

Some of the first tulpas were "watchers". I think egregore is the term. They were designed to go places and see things and report back.

 

...what I used to have was an involuntary egregore -- a tulpa to multiple people who would engage it in conversation during meditation. Its rambling nature had not been planned by me, but seemed to be its impetus from the beginning.

 

When information wasn't lost in translation, the 'egregore's' alleged ability to act as a messenger was astounding. All it needed to be sensed and understood was a person's genuine openness and prerequisite ability to perceive their unconscious mind.

[Yori]

Well now I want more details >.> Do you mind? You can skip any private experiences.

[left blank]

Well now I want more details >.> Do you mind? You can skip any private experiences.

 

I only have reservations when I feel someone's trying to fuel an argument or trounce me in a showdown of internet sciolism. Benefit of the doubt, feel free to ask questions publicly or privately!

 

I've also been slowly writing a retrospective "progress report" that I might try posting in the near future, but my plans are tentative at best.

[Yori]

Just describing your remote viewing experiences, or shoudl I say, your tulpas. No argument here. I'm not a skeptic.

[left blank]

Just describing your remote viewing experiences, or shoudl I say, your tulpas. No argument here. I'm not a skeptic.

 

The problem is that I'd have to consolidate nearly two years of detailed journaling into a comprehensive post. Unfortunately that's no easy task, and I'd be abetting a devastating thread derailment in the process!

 

Also, despite my outlandish claims, I'm actually extremely skeptical and suspicious of any anomalous report, including my own. So, in the absence of hard evidence, I'd like to present the most balanced and open-ended account that I can.

 

But, in brief, my tulpa showed interest in contacting my friends from the very start. Shortly after that, he began to exhibit a seemingly uncanny capacity for relaying remote or obscure information.

 

And then there were times I would detect his absence and later be notified of his presence in the location of a friend thousands of miles away. Comparing notes would reveal consistent parallels between the tulpa's reports and the other person's discourse with him.

 

The visitations escalated to more direct experiences where I would merge with him to sense distant locations, either through dreams or meditation. Some of these events were involuntary while others were carefully conducted.

 

Without examining the documents carefully, I'd say the success rate, or frequency of synchronism, was above chance — maybe 60% as a conservative estimate, and as high as 75%. One day I'll post more about this because I believe anyone can achieve the same level of craziness and contribute to a growing pool of interest and potential evidence.