Phi June 24, 2012 June 24, 2012 Tulpa becoming physical? Moving water? Since when did the mods turn into trolls? >That feel when matter IS energy. ( E=mc^2 anyone? ) Didn't some neutrinos travel faster than the speed of light inside the LHC awhile back?
Andrew June 24, 2012 June 24, 2012 Didn't some neutrinos travel faster than the speed of light inside the LHC awhile back? They were measured to be faster than the speed of light. And not in the LHC, it was them travelling through the earth. But it was only a few billionths of a second faster. You try measuring that accurately. And considering the clocks were on the other side of the world, the clocks would be out of sync a tiny tiny bit. (The faster you move, the slower time becomes. Einstein told us that. So moving them across the world would shave a few billionths of a second off) They never said "Oh shit, look what we discovered," they said "where is our mistake?" But the press went wild. "What did you do today?" "Oh, you know, got called a hater by a schizophrenic's marijuana-fueled wolf hallucination." "Righteous!" I call her Philos. My BLOG is updated daily.
Tirek June 24, 2012 June 24, 2012 Wasn't this supposed to be a place of science? Why would anyone even consider this in the first place? Being overly cautious in everything. Progress: Reading and planning. Trying to get hold of being in my wonderland.
Guest Anonymous June 24, 2012 June 24, 2012 So you're saying that we can turn a construct of our minds, and turn it into something with mass? If your friend has evidence of it, please tell me. Because I don't believe that you can create something from nothing.
Andrew June 24, 2012 June 24, 2012 I don't believe that you can create something from nothing. You can, as long as you give it back. Where did the Universe come from? The Big Bang. There is more Matter than Antimatter in the Universe, so we've gained something. Which is why I'm in favour of the Big Crunch ending. If you have nothing, then you can have something as long as you have nothing ON AVEREGE. But the amount you have to give is phenominal. As I pointed out earlier. "What did you do today?" "Oh, you know, got called a hater by a schizophrenic's marijuana-fueled wolf hallucination." "Righteous!" I call her Philos. My BLOG is updated daily.
Phi June 24, 2012 June 24, 2012 You can, as long as you give it back. Where did the Universe come from? The Big Bang. There is more Matter than Antimatter in the Universe, so we've gained something. Which is why I'm in favour of the Big Crunch ending. If you have nothing, then you can have something as long as you have nothing ON AVEREGE. But the amount you have to give is phenominal. As I pointed out earlier. The Big Bang does not explain the creation of the universe, it only explains the rapid growth of it. The Big Bang did not create the universe. Also, the universe is mathematically 'nothing'; Its net energy is always zero (with some quantum fluctuations). Also, we're fairly certain that we live in a flat universe, which doesn't have the Big Crunch as an ending.
Guest Anonymous June 24, 2012 June 24, 2012 inb4 Lucid says something about using tulpae in the military and world domination bla bla. I aint even mad. Anyone who believes you can create matter and energy by somehow vibrating subatomic particles with your mind or something aren't really worth explaining to. I'll just sit back and watch this all unfold.
Pronas June 25, 2012 June 25, 2012 COULD THIS BE THE DEATH OF TULPA.INFO? FIND OUT NEXT WEEK, ON: I DONT GIVE A FLYING FUCK WHAT YOU GUYS DO WITH YOUR TUPPERS
Andrew June 25, 2012 June 25, 2012 Also, the universe is mathematically 'nothing'; Its net energy is always zero (with some quantum fluctuations). Yep. And it is my belief that the universe is nothing more than a quantum fluctuation, itself. "What did you do today?" "Oh, you know, got called a hater by a schizophrenic's marijuana-fueled wolf hallucination." "Righteous!" I call her Philos. My BLOG is updated daily.
Virgil June 25, 2012 June 25, 2012 Well, E=mc^2=70*(300 000 000^2)=6.3x10^18 Joules, if I've counted my zeros correctly. The entire WORLD's nuclear power stations only throw out 3.7x10^11 Joules per second. Several orders of magnitude away from what you need. Yeah, if you had the ability to produce 1.5 million kilotons of TNT-equivalent energy, you'd probably use it for something much more spectacular than creating beings. By the way, the joule per second is a unit of power (the watt), not energy. Didn't some neutrinos travel faster than the speed of light inside the LHC awhile back? It's possible that the speed of light, even in vacuum, is not the maximum speed (denoted by c) at which something can travel. Perhaps the constant will change in the future when a particle or something that can travel slightly faster is discovered. But I think I might be wrong here, because I probably lack a bit of information crucial for my reasoning. Never mind. Bayesian inference
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.