Tulpas in New York Times

[Guest MegaBusta]

It's more that it didn't really present any point. Just looked like a large rant about "those damn kids on my lawn" to me.

 

The point is to improve the quality of posts.

[nilink]

 

I would say this is very untrue, it only seems this way because those who do this are, in a sense, louder. As in they talk about it more and try to tell everyone about it.

Well I better not stay on this forum then.

[Zero]

 

The point is to improve the quality of posts.

 

Then do so by judging posts, and not the age of the posters.

[jean-luc]

Well I better not stay on this forum then.

 

Sorry, I meant on the internet in general.

[Guest MegaBusta]

 

Then do so by judging posts, and not the age of the posters.

 

And he wasn't asking to get rid of posts by 14 year olds.

 

He was asking to get rid of posts that look like they were written by the stereotypical 14 year old.

[Zero]

Except using "posts that were written by stereotypical 14 year olds" is a bad way of saying it. Starts arguments like these. Better to say "get rid of immature posts". No one hurt, everyone agrees. Approach and usage of words is very important if you want to make yourself understood.

[Bedhead]

If said article is true (Even though everyone is different) That would explain some things with my tulpa regarding spending enough time a day with her.