Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So I do a lot of mindfulness, as in, daily mindfulness meditation for almost two years, with other mindfulness stuff featured (walking, eating, body scans etc), to the point of having experiences bordering the psychedelic in intensity ("being so present you kinda stop existing and feel everything at once", for lack of a better description), and I notice as I further engage with this practice, my dissociation radically declines. I used to have heavy depersonalisation-derealisation disorder and was very "unintegrated" as a person, like I lived in a very foggy state of mind and my sense of self was fragmented and discontinuous and I maladaptively daydreamed, whereas now things feel more real than they ever have, and I can make sense of myself as a person, although there's still work to be done. I do have a tulpa per se, had her for a few years, but since a major breakdown two years ago, she's been in er, "low-energy mode", and has regressed substantially, and until now I've not had the time or space to really resume practice more than a "5 minute maintenance".

 

Hence my question: is mindfulness practice anathema to tulpamancy, and/or vice versa? Given it drastically reduces dissociation, and tulpamancy may augment it. On the other hand, did not the concept of Tulpas arise from Buddhist practices, of which mindful breath-focus meditations are a staple (Vipassana, Jhana etc)?

 

Has anyone out there got experiences with both of these things? Are they reconcilable? Like, am I just cancelling out the tulpa with mindfulness, or invoking DP/DR with tulpamancy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can only really comment on the practice of mindfulness as it relates to tulpas, rather than DP/DR, so keep this in mind, but I'll at least comment on that.

 

What I would say is that the skills involved in the two practices of mindfulness and passive forcing run extremely parallel to one another. Focus and awareness are the key skills of passive forcing, as they are for mindfulness, only it's bringing your attention repeatedly back to your tulpa rather than you. If you can turn that awareness of yourself towards the awareness of the general presence of a tulpa, you're essentially good to go and hypothetically you could just make them this way just by talking to them continually - no visualization or dissociation is technically needed. That said, mindfulness itself as a practice, like a lot of Buddhist-style meditations exist largely to cancel out stray thoughts, or make them meaningless. Just as the skills associated with it can be turned towards a tulpa to help actualize them, they can be turned upon your own state to drown out all stray thought and essentially prevent development, as you surmise, though only as long as you are actually in the state of mindfulness. Practicing mindfulness itself won't remove your progress with tulpamancy, though, but ignoring your tulpa for large periods of time will. Do not be tempted to attribute the regression of the tulpa to the mindfulness itself, when the reality is that tulpas just need the majority of your time to become fully realized and ideally after that should continue to spend a lot of time with you. It's a symptom of your focus being on something other than the tulpa that it is regressing, not that the something is mindfulness as a thing.

 

On the point of Buddhist meditation, tulpamancy is usually associated with visualization-style meditation and the intentional focused activation of the mind, whereas mindfulness is generally to quiet it. I may be pulling this out of my ass but if memory serves tulpas are related loosely to the practice of deity-visualization in Buddhism. In a general sense visualization meditation is active forcing. And it's all about trying to reach that ideal dissociated near-hypnotic trance state where you are entirely submerged in an image. It's notable that the skill here is in rapidly attaining dissociation and complexity of the image, not actually continually experiencing it, which is not generally possible for most whilst maintaining a sense of your surroundings and interacting with the world. Imposition doesn't include any need for dissociation, nor does the open-eye visualization it's generally based on. In essence, the two practices are opposed, but only in the sense they are entirely opposite skillsets, so it is not impossible to for most to learn and integrate both of them into a routine outside of the considerations of your own mental limits. Practicing one does not weaken your skill with the other, though.

 

In short, the majority of your time with the tulpa is actually spent, ideally, in a state similar to mindfulness where you are focused on the tulpa continually. The state of dissociation is essentially only desirable when doing active forcing meditation, likely in a wonderland, or if you're switching with the tulpa or otherwise attempting to cede control of the body to them in some way. Indeed, since that's the case it would be entirely possible to avoid dissociation as a state entirely by only doing open-eye visualization with the tulpa, and focusing on those mindfulness aspects to the practice.

Zen - Host 

Mika - Tulpa

If text is uncoloured, presume Zen is talking.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, CloudAurora said:

Hence my question: is mindfulness practice anathema to tulpamancy, and/or vice versa?

 

We have practiced some mindfulness meditation on and off over the last 2 and 1/2 years. We have used a body scan, sometimes Gray (my host) will visualize something, observe his thoughts, etc. We never practiced enough to the point we achieved a psychedelic effect.

 

Gray observed that mindfulness meditation causes him dissociate rather than associate. Using the body scanner, wonderland immersion, eating imaginary food, etc.

 

The exception is looking around our environment and paying attention to what we are experiencing. We use call this associating and we use it to help ground ourself while switching in.

 

5 hours ago, CloudAurora said:

I notice as I further engage with this practice, my dissociation radically declines.

 

If all mindful meditation produces this effect, I'm wondering if we're not talking about the same dissociation or we have different experiences with the practice.

 

5 hours ago, CloudAurora said:

I used to have heavy depersonalisation-derealisation disorder and was very "unintegrated" as a person, like I lived in a very foggy state of mind and my sense of self was fragmented and discontinuous and I maladaptively daydreamed,

 

We had issues with derealization, but not depersonalization or maladaptive daydreaming. Gray felt fragmented as a "person" because he created multiple tulpas thinking they were both "characters" and "clones", not because his sense of self was thrown out the window.

 

Our dissociation never became an intense enough experience to become a dissociative disorder. If you had that level of dissociation, I'm assuming mindfulness will help you enjoy a more normal amount of dissociation or help you ground.

 

I also wonder if being more experienced with mindfulness meditation also creates a different effect. We never came close to practicing it once every day for at least 20 minutes.

 

Overall, tulpamancy and mindfulness meditation tend to overlap, but your situation may be different enough it complicates that connection. I believe if you can run around in wonderland, you will be just fine. Your experience with meditation may make forcing and wonderland immersion easier.

 


 

5 hours ago, CloudAurora said:

Like, am I just cancelling out the tulpa with mindfulness, or invoking DP/DR with tulpamancy?

 

Tulpamancy is definitely not derealization. When Gray is derealized, he feels like everything around him in real life is fake and there's a sensory fog between him and the world. In the back, I try to calm him down and encourage him to associate. While derealization sometimes amplifies my mindvoice, it's not an ideal state for forcing given a panic attack is typically a precursor to an episode.

 

While not quite derealization, Gray can experience another foggy state while overwhelmed in the grocery store. I usually take advantage of my thoughts being clearer than his and my amplified mindvoice by telling Gray what he needs to do. I call this back-seat fronting, even though this can be done in other situations without dissociation.

 

The only time I think we came close to having depersonalization is Gray feeling disconnected as I was possessing the body and felt like he was completely removed for a second. While Gray normally feels a little weird observing my possession, this experience stood out as more extreme than normal.

 


 

6 hours ago, CloudAurora said:

and I can make sense of myself as a person, although there's still work to be done.

 

I don't know if it's a good idea to play with tulpamancy right now. Tulpamancy naturally challenges your sense of self, so having a shakey sense of who you are to begin with can create more problems down the road. I think one of the reasons teenagers tend to have trouble is they're establishing their sense of self and tulpamancy messes with that.

 

That's not to say tulpamancy can't be done, that's how we came about. If you do want to try tulpamancy again, I highly recommend informing a professional or at least having a professional monitor where you are and if you're doing okay.

I'm Ranger, Gray's/Cat_ShadowGriffin's tulpa, and I love hippos! I also like cake and chatting about stuff.

My other headmates have their own account now.

Temporary Log | Switching LogcBox | Yay! | Bre Translator

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not had derealization or depersonalization, but I practice dissociation regularly to experience mindspace as a refuge and place of introspection. This is anti-grounding, it literally brings fantasy into the memories of reality. I think it strongly supports having headmates and spending time with them.

 

It sounds like your mindfullness practice is strongly grounding. Though it sounds contradictory with psychedelic experience, it seems you have a technique that works for you.

 

Depersonalization and derealization are big issues for the community in general that I've avoided. It seems like tulpamancy decreases those strong groundings in reality and opens people up to a mild psychosis. This makes me wonder if the practice is safe for certain individuals, or at least it's not being done in a safe manor.

 

Given my experience in the community, I believe your intuition on this is correct. For some it might not be easily reconciled, and especially those who've had trauma in early childhood. Again I'm an exception because I did, yet I show no signs or progress toward dissociative identity disorder or psychosis. If anything, I've become more grounded over time with my headmates.

 

I don't know what the contributing factors are as to why some have these issues, beginning (or realized) even years after starting tulpamancy.

 

Good luck. 

 

In summary, I'm certain that tulpamancy is ungrounding in general. Meaning it would expose those prone to DR/DP.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, CloudAurora said:

is mindfulness practice anathema to tulpamancy, and/or vice versa?

 

Not only do I not think it is an anathema, I think it may be one of the most important things needed to experience tulpamancy at its full potential. I am still working on it myself though, but I can only imagine the potential for experiences to increase as concentration does.

Creation for creation's sake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have also had a mindfulness-of-breath meditation practice for a few years, though I've never practiced as intensely as you describe. I have less experience with tulpamancy, only a few months, so please take my opinion with a grain of salt!

My experience has been that mindfulness and tulpamancy have a strong synergy. The lessons mindfulness teaches about how to work skillfully with the mind apply to forcing, too. Active forcing with visualization seems to me like it has a very heavy meditation component, and even in passive forcing, the ability to quickly realize when your mind is wandering, appreciate that realization, and return to the task at hand helps a lot. Meanwhile, being mindful during tulpaforcing is still a perfectly good way of training your mindfulness, so you get to kill two birds with one stone. (Having a tulpa has also increased my motivation to meditate regularly, though that does not seem to be a problem for you! 😄)
 

On 1/22/2021 at 7:26 AM, CloudAurora said:

Hence my question: is mindfulness practice anathema to tulpamancy, and/or vice versa? Given it drastically reduces dissociation


I was not 100 percent clear in what sense you are using dissociation here--my limited understanding of dissociation as it relates to tulpamancy is that it means either the host does not identify with everything experienced by the body and mind (I think mindfulness might help with this part, as it helps you realize how much of the stuff you're used to identifying with is actually just happening automatically), or the host does not perceive sensory input anymore, maybe during a really hardcore switch (if being grounded in your senses is a strong habit for you, this might be difficult, but I don't think it runs totally counter to the goals of mindfulness meditation). I hope someone will correct me if I'm barking up the wrong tree here!

Host: Wray (he, him)
Tulpa: Shizuku (she, her) 🐺

We now have a progress report!

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/21/2021 at 11:26 PM, CloudAurora said:

Hence my question: is mindfulness practice anathema to tulpamancy, and/or vice versa?

 

Whaaa? Tulpamancy does not at all require dissociation/derealization or rejection of reality. I'd honestly say it's harmful for the people who practice it like that to do so.

 

Tulpamancy is a learned mental skill, and mindfulness can only help. At the very least it should improve your mental plasticity and make mind-based endeavors easier - putting yourself in a pseudo-coma in bed shutting out your senses is an awful way to practice tulpamancy (I once had to stop someone on this site from doing exactly that lol, and he later realized it was totally unnecessary). Tulpamancy is practically always recommended to be practiced in a meditative state, which is generally its own form of mindfulness.

 

You can meditate, visualize or whatever have you perfectly fine to develop a tulpa without any fear of being too grounded. Maybe keeping your eyes closed and/or lying down will help with that practice, but it's no different from most forms of meditation.

 

I'd say the main thing differentiating meditation and daydream/fantasizing is mindfulness, even.

Hi! I'm Lumi, host of Reisen, Tewi, Flandre and Lucilyn.

Everyone deserves to love and be loved. It's human nature.

My tulpas and I have a Q&A thread, which was the first (and largest) of its kind. Feel free to ask us stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By neo
      Earlier this week was having a lot of head pressure due to extended periods of visualizing, so as the pressures became annoying and persistent enough, I thought I should address it.
      I've noticed before that my head pressures are related to the way I was flexing my tongue muscles really hard and pressing it against my palate inadvertently.
      I have tried many times visualizing without doing this and, it works momentarily but whenever I stop paying attention to my tongue, there it goes again pressing my palate really hard once I start to concentrate into the visualization. I only notice that I'm doing that after I already start to feel the head pressures. By that time it's too late and it's already bothering me.
       
      So after two days of attempting to visualize with my tongue relaxed without success I thought that I should probably google that.
      So there I go googling the terms "tongue" and "meditation" and I came across this:

      https://www.easyayurveda.com/2020/01/31/khechari-mudra/

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khecarī_mudrā
       
      Very weird, right? That's what I thought too.
      Basically, they stick the tongue up into the nasal cavity above the palate and use that to aid the process of meditation.
      So of course I went down this rabbit hole and found out that some people seem know how to do this naturally.
      This girl is an example of someone that has this ability naturally:
      https://youtu.be/ijpBUfOTBT0
       
      Also other people report having head pressures identical to what we see in tulpamancy in this practice, here's an example of someone describing their head pressures in the context of Kriya meditation:
      https://www.reddit.com/r/kriyayoga/comments/mgpk73/tension_in_the_head_during_dhyana/
       
      Described as "tension in the head that is somewhere between no pain and the pain you experience during a headache."
      This seems to me like it's the same kind of head pressure we experience in tulpamancy. At least to me.
       
      Also I forgot to mention that, they say THIS GIVES YOU IMMORTALITY.
      Which, of course, is bullshit otherwise there would be 1000 year old yogis walking around.
      Then I thought it would be a good idea to ask around here because, well to be honest, the people that practice this don't know how to explain it without anecdotes and dogmatic stories. Which is fine for spiritual people but I want to find what part is real and what part isn't. Or a deconstruction to find the line where the anecdotes end and the actual benefits of this practice begin. Or if there are any benefits at all.
       
      Here is a small list of claims about this technique: (which I have absolute no idea if it's true or not)
       
      -Helps you overcome hunger and makes it so that you go extended periods of time without food.
      -Gives you access to DMT that is stored in your pineal gland. By licking it directly. (yeah gross, the girl in the video seemed to get very high from doing it, she even says she's high afterwards)
      -The practitioner doesn't suffer from decay, disease and death. (this part I think it's flat out not true)
      -Gives you immunity to snake poison. (This one I think it's sorta possible, because some snake poison triggers your immune response and the response of the body is what kills the person not the poison itself, so technically by controlling your immune response you would therefore not die from the poison)
       
      So my questions are:
       
      1-Does anybody else experience their tongue forcing up the palate unintentionally while visualizing or concentrating really hard?
      2-If so, do you think this is related to Khechari mudra? Or is it just tension and I'm looking way too much into it?
      3-Are those just stories and not meant to be interpreted literally? (If so people are doing a bad job at explaining that)
      4-Is there something to this at all? Is it a practice worth looking into?
       
      Just thought it would be cool to ask here, since if I asked on their forum they would either not tell me because it's a closed practice, or even if they did tell me I wouldn't understand because the vocabulary they use is very far removed from anything I can contextualize.
       
      So what do you guys think? Is it all nonsense or not?
    • By neo
      I don't really believe in metaphysics stuff but today I did experience something that I think a lot of people would describe as being "astral projection". The reason this isn't in the metaphysics category is because it's not really metaphysics to me after all, or at the very least it doesn't require any sort of meta assumptions in order to experience this phenomena. So let me describe here the process and if there's someone that has done this before please tell me if this is the same thing as what they call "astral projection". Or even if you're skeptic like me you can still experience this phenomena and it may help if you're struggling with wonderland immersion like I was.
      I started by sitting down and closing my eyes, then started to rub my hands together in front of my face and trying to keep my awareness focused on the shape of my hands and arms in front of me. Slowly keeping track of their position and "sculpting" my own arms to get a real good memory of their shape and how it feels to move them without opening my eyes.
      Then afterwards I rested my right hand by the side of my body and started to use just the memory of a minute ago to move an imaginary right arm and interact with the real left arm. So it became left arm real, right arm imaginary.
      Then I proceeded to sculpt the imaginary right arm with the real one, and then the real one using the imaginary right arm. Going vice versa back and forth.
      Then I rested my left arm also by my side and started using both imaginary arms to sculpt each other.
      After a couple minutes of that I just put both imaginary hands on the back of my head as if I was going to do a sit up and I just yanked my perspective back by pushing my real head forward with my imaginary arms and immediately started sculpting the back of my head from that new perspective as if my real head was outside of me, then the rest of my real body. I felt completely removed from my body by keeping awareness of it from an outsider perspective, the longer I sculpted my body the more removed I felt from it, and the more intense and overwhelming the sensation of being outside became, it's even a little scary. it's very different from daydreaming and even imposition. Never experienced anything similar and I am now able to recreate this experience this way whenever I want. It doesn't last a lot at first because it's quite overwhelming but that only makes it seem more consistent with other peoples "astral projection" reports that I've seen so far. If this is the same as astral projection then I'm curious as to what to do next. I'm also pretty sure this can be used to force by having your tulpa sculpt you while looking through their perspective as well.
      Anyway feel free to share any info you may have on the subject or your own experience with this stuff. I'm quite interested to see what else is there to explore even though I don't really believe in the meta stuff I'm still interested in experiencing these kind of phenomena.
       
    • By libra_ry_
      Hi! Sorry for the title, I didn't know exactly how to phrase it. Also, this sounds like a lot of the posts here, but it is actually different.
      Anyway, I recently started creating my tulpa, but I want to feel her presence more often. Whenever I can remember, I try to narrate to her, but sometimes I forget to actually think about her and am just talking to myself. I also can't remember to constantly think about her, because I get distracted pretty easily and sometimes have to concentrate on something a lot. I know you don't have to constantly talk to tulpas, but I know it can be beneficial and I like talking to her.
      (I also do active forcing sometimes, but not as often as passive)
      Thank you for answering!
    • By BearBaeBeau
      This was the original post containing the question, which has been deemed the OP of this thread. If you would like to see the original thread, please go here. -Ranger
       
       
      It was not my intent to start a thread about this and I don't like that it was decided to make it my thread. My personal feelings about gateway systems and soulbonds of all kinds are contentious and controversial in this community at times because of the possible consequences, real or imagined, regarding roleplaying and supposed "proper" system architecture. I won't say more because this sort lf argument becomes divisive quickly and I really didn't want to discuss it formally anymore.
       
      My comments herein have been edited for clarity in light of the context of a new thread.
       
       
       
       
      Some things can't be proven or disproven.
       
      I apply occam's razor but I have to be careful because "a wizard did it" is dang simple as far as explanations go, but it's completely ungrounded and baseless. It's equally important to at least entertain falsifiablility before you come to the conclusion that "it's a parallel dimension."
       
      The subconscious mind is so vast and unknown, no metaphysical notions are even necessary. If a whole other and much more complex construction can run in your subconscious mind, who needs anything else. Look up the computation power of the human brain and you'll find there's plenty of headroom for virtually anything. As long as you're comfortable with that, and explore it, the power of this is effectively boundless as it's possible that it vastly overshadows consious thought.
       
      Remember the complexities of your most vivid and varied dream, that's a lower bound.
    • By R8-Adelia_Wildhome
      I apologize if this isn't the correct place for this, but if you are going to move it, please notify me so I know where to go, thanks! 
       
      So I think we might be a gateway system, or soulbounds, or possibly a combination.
      My understanding of a gateway system: A system that A) has connections to other realms, and the head-mates are able to enter and exit those realms as they please, and B) A system that is mainly comprised of non-permanent walk-in head-mates. 
      Soulbounds I don't totally understand, but something I saw (on a Wikki,) seemed to depict them as more permanent. 
       
      why we might be a gateway system: 
      We have had a looooottt of head-mates through the ages. Around 10+ different ones, and some who "changed" completely. Now where did they go? I... don't know. Some of them, we decided they were going to explore the real world because my mind wasn't suited for them, sometimes this was "the real world" other times they would go other places, I'm not certain where, but they weren't in my mind any more. Ethel has lots of memories from another dimension. She keeps remembering more, and some are becoming clearer. We realllllyyy easily get walk-ins who I basically invalidate so much they disappear.* These can simply be characters who I attach to and begin to have conversations with, or just a pretty Pinterest drawing character. Sometimes they are simply made-up characters in my mind, but other times they seem to actually have a mind of their own. And for the second, no matter how hard I try, we can't (typically) keep a head-mate for over a few months, some are exceptions. I have only truly done the technical tulpa creation process for... two. Two tulpas. One who was a merge, and my first tulpa. 
       
      We are a completely endogenic system, but I think that they can still be gateway systems. 
       
      I have some questions/concerns about being a gateway system. The following could be interpreted as invalidating gateway systems,  I am not trying to do that, I just do that sometimes to myself.
       
      Questions
      -What are other gateway systems experiences? 
      -Are there any things that could also be considered gateway system "things"? 
      -Does it sound like I am a part of a gateway system? 
      -Is it normal that even though I could be a gateway system, we also struggle with possession and switching? 
      -I can't do anything that the others can do (portal-going wise), because I am the host. Is that correct?
       
      Concerns: 
      I feel like I might just be faking this... like I know I'm not faking any of my experiences, and I feel so connected to this concept, but there's the little voice in the middle of my mind that shouts "your just faking this!! You can't be a part of a gateway system!!!" 
      I do connect to the term, but it also makes me a little nervous, I feel really attached to my current head-mates, and I don't want them to leave. 
      *I don't know how to stop this behavior. I have no idea how many head-mates I would have if I let them be, but they do leave naturally, especially when there is more than three of us. And being a bigger system feels so natural and comforting. (This is connecting to my other * in which I said "We realllllyyy easily get walk-ins who I basically invalidate so much they disappear.") 
      I haven't always noticed this at the time it's happening, but looking back I can see plenty of examples. I used to just blame this on having a big imagination, and so I would "imagine" they went on a trip to spain, or had lots of memories that even I couldn't come up with. Of course, there's a 40-50% chance that this is just me having a big imagination. 
      do I even understand what a gateway system is? Is it even fair for me to possibly consider myself part of one? 
       
      Closing/tl;dr: 
      I might be a part of a gateway system, a term I really connect to, but I do have skeptical feelings about myself being one. I'm not even sure I understand what they are. From my understanding, I match it, but from another's understanding, I might not be it at all. I think that since I connect to this in a way I don't normally connect to something, it could be a sign. (Why I think I am a gateway system: We are super prone to walk-ins, and have had a LOT of head-mates who were pretty short-term. They also went just... away. Like into a different realm, as I "imagined") 
      I would really appreciate some feedback and guidance about this. I can give more information on any of these things, just ask. 
       
      Thanks to anyone who responds : ) 
       
      (After more reading on soulbounds, I do not believe we are soulbounds, but someone else might believe otherwise. 
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...