Jump to content

Tulpa wants to make NPC servitor sentient

Recommended Posts

I frequently populate my wonderlands with semi-independent NPCs to add spice and flavor to the setting as a whole. Recently, Akemi has grown rather attached to one of them, and wants to develop her into a full system-member.


Is this advisable? I'm not sure what's going to come out of an NPC designed by me and forced by a tulpa. I have no issues with making her a full system member personally, and neither have the other members of my system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I can't say I have any experience in the subject, but I don't see why not. I feel that the worst that could happen is it just doesn't really develop beyond an NPC, or stays sort of half NPC and half system member. I feel like if I were an NPC which was then given sentience and intelligence, it'd be like waking up from a weird trance. That thought evokes strange feelings in me, so I honestly think I'd advise against it for the NPC's sake. But hey, I could be wrong, and it might just be me.


(Verdict Status: Failed to reach a final verdict)

I'm IBreakGames, a genuine dude.


We gave up on using different colors for each of us, so there's Al, Ollie, and Eva. We're all rabbits, get over it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

[Tri] It is certainly doable. First step is disclosure, where you tell them that they are in a system and bring them into the loop. Now, is it advisable, that is harder to say. We were originally like NPC's and we did disclose to Gaea's parents inside, though they are not interested in participating in the system much other than they are glad when any of us come over. So we wouldn't be here if it wasn't for it. But, it is important that if you do do it, you be there for them. They will have a lot of self-exploration to do, and maybe some troubles, and could need someone there. If you can't do that, then it is not advisable to make them into system members. If you can, you still need to think it out.

Tri = {V, O, G}, Ice and Frostbite and Breach (all formerly Hail), and others

System Name: Fall Family

Former Username: hail_fall

Contributor and administrator on a supplementary tulpamancy resource and associated forum, Tulpa.io and Tulpa.io/discuss/.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anonymous

I am not too educated on the topic of wonderlands, 'NPCs' (who, to me, seem to be mere projections of a concept in your mind). If that counts for anything, in my mind, my tulpa has created a mindscape where there's a 'NPC' her, as in, an Ikazuchi that does absolutely nothing but stupid stuff when I come to think of it. She made this NPC for certain developmental purposes. But that's not our topic.

I think that, well, bringing an NPC to 'sentience' (and I use this term loosely) is 100% like making a tulpa from scratch. You have a concept in your mind, the concept of a certain individual, or any entity, the one that your tulpa seems to be attached to. One thing we need to understand and clarify firsthand is that the tulpa won't be Akemi's beloved 'NPC'. I'm not saying this in the purpose of dissuading you to integrate the tulpa into a systemmate, that is not my intention, but thinking of it rationally, one way, this NPC would come to realize that it had been living a sort of 'lie' (because all NPCs aren't actually sentient, or rather, let us say that they possess no autonomy in the first place; They act according to your mind, your imagination, let's say. NPCs that cannot have their own thoughts, I suppose.). An NPC that would feel the simple weight of sentience (and concepts that go from, well, non-existence to possessing sentience) would have the same experience as a 'newborn' tulpa.


I made NPCs in empty mindscapes, too. I made a NPC of Heinrich Lunge, I made a NPC of my Medic in TF2, I made a NPC of House M.D, I made a NPC of myself. I made a NPC of Trevor from GTA V, I made a NPC from Dr.Manhattan. They're not much compared to what a tulpa truly is. If anything, after we were done using them, all of them transformed into this form of energy Ikazuchi proceeded to 'devour' in some sense. I can still make NPCs fairly easily, they are far from sentience much less autonomy.


In shorter terms, while it is possible, it really is like creating another tulpa, because well, you have the background and whatnot. I suppose that the creation process would come out as easier because of many factors. I also think that there may be higher chances of self-doubt due to the background.


I would like to say that I have talked with a certain tulpa, with sentience and whatnot, who was originally a NPC. This tulpa used to live as an NPC in a large city, with many folks and whatnot. All NPCs. The host is a writer, so imagining people like that helped him, I suppose? Well, one day, this character came to life. And do you know what her reaction was? She was crushed by reality. The reality that her friends were fake compared to her, that her life had been fake. She had memories of her previous life, and every single day was depressing for her, it took a lot of motivation, weeks of effort (and 5 minutes from the part of my Ikazuchi) to make her understand that it was merely the past.


Make what you want out of what I said, but I think that NPCs are better off remaining NPCs. You might end up with too many tulpas. Oh, and you can technically say that NPCs have pseudo-sentience, my NPCs were of good aid in some fields, I wouldn't compare them to my tulpa. Many people seem to confuse pseudo-sentience with sentience, but I will leave it at that. Good luck.


I like your avatar. The truth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, having too many tulpas can be a concern. I've set my cap at 7 - no more than 7 tulpas barring truly exceptional circumstances. I've spoken to Akemi about it and the rest of my system-mates and she still wants to go through. Stephanie thinks that it might be good for her mental health and existential crisis issues after finding out she's been a thoughtform and that basically her whole life was a lie.


Thanks a lot for the advice Anderson, I'll keep it in mind. Personally I think Akemi might have an ulterior motive as well - she wants to prove to herself that she's "real" enough to create a tulpas of her own, even if I'll never get her to admit it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Cat_ShadowGriffin
      I released a new version here: https://community.tulpa.info/topic/16772-how-to-refocus-on-your-wonderland/
      This guide expands on concepts described in Chupi’s and Nikodemos’s guides by explaining when and how to apply those skills in order to focus and achieve better visualization of your wonderland. I will briefly summarize the concepts described in these guides as I describe the following method, however these guides go more in depth on how to practice the skills used for this method.
      This guide assumes you have a wonderland, but this method can also be applied to visualizing objects in a void. This method works best when active forcing, the process of providing your un-divided attention to your Tulpa, to minimize distractions.
      I used to tell people my visualization was bad because I struggled to get a clear image of my Tulpa and my wonderland most of the time. I eventually realized that my ability to focus greatly impacted my ability to visualize my wonderland, and all of the black voids and blurry imagery were a result of poor focus. I put this guide together because this strategy really helped me to the point where I can confidently visualize my wonderland at any time and not get frustrated by it anymore.
      The Process In Short
      This method is slowly drawing your attention away from distractions and towards your wonderland. You start with setting your mind on visualizing a simple object and slowly working your way up, visualizing more complex objects one at a time until you become satisfied with your visualization.
      Summary of the Visualization Skill
      This skill is all about looking at an object and asking yourself how it should look, feel, take up space, etc. For example, if you have grass in your wonderland, one could ask about the color of the grass, the height and shape of the blades, what species of grass it is, if it’s made out of cotton candy, the texture of the grass, how it feels when you walk in it, etc. The more questions you can answer, the more information you will have about that particular object. Having more information allows you to visualize the details of that object more effectively and thus requiring a lot of your attention to create the object’s image.
      A Detailed Walkthrough
      Before you sit down to visualize your wonderland, your images may be foggy and you may have a bunch of distracting thoughts that are far more interesting than blurry, incomprehensible images. In this state, remember that your visualization is not bad, you’re just distracted and your visualization will get better.
      The first step is to get in a comfortable position and think about slowing down. If you want to, doing a form of relaxation breathing may be helpful for getting settled.
      Next, start with taking a simple object such as a sphere or a cube. What color is the sphere? Is it smooth or bumpy? Is it soft and squishy or firm like a billiard ball? What is the temperature of the sphere? Continue to visualize your simple object until you are satisfied and or bored.
      Next, slowly move onto the next object. Suppose the next object is a tree. Is it a real tree or a fantasy creation? How tall is it? Could you climb it if you wanted to? Is the season changing the colors of the leaves? Is there a tree shape that “feels right?” As you visualize more and more details, your tree will feel more and more real.
      If you feel satisfied with your visualization, then congratulations, you achieve better visualization! If you still feel like your visualization is still fuzzy or you are bored, slowly move onto an even more sophisticated object or instead look around you and visualize the ground, the sky, your Tulpa, any other neighboring objects, etc.
      The key to this method is slowing down and shifting your attention to what you are visualizing. If you get bored and you warp yourself to a parade or a war zone, that can lead you to getting distracted again.
      More complex objects are supposed to be interesting for you to look at. If a tree isn’t to your taste, you could also do furniture, a vending machine, a weapon, etc. I recommend picking something you find interesting, because why have it in your wonderland if you don’t like it? Visualizing moving objects are fine as long as it is not your starting object. I don’t recommend loud or overwhelming objects because the point is to calm down and focus, not feel overwhelmed and become distracted. Unless you are really comfortable with what your Tulpa’s form looks like, I don’t recommend starting off with that. Like any other complex object, their form may be too much for you to focus on right now, but it won’t be after you built your way up to that level of complexity. If your Tulpa is sentient, they can guide you to look at certain things, or they may ask for you to visualize something for them. Why not, right? They may surprise you with a real treat! In Conclusion
      Once you feel comfortable with your visualization, have fun! Now that your visualizations are stable, you can go ahead and visualize exciting things like flying on dragons or shooting aliens in space since your mind is so focused on the wonderland you most likely forgot about whatever else was distracting you and your immediate surroundings in real life.
      Submitted for Guides.
    • By Shadow System
      [Exabier] We have a wonderland problem. Gray is afraid of controlling us when he's not actually talking to us. Talking gets pretty boring after awhile compared to all of the actual cool stuff like having sword fights, shooting bad guys, whatever. He gets the fear from watching us do stuff and thinks it's sometimes like parroting his story characters, whatever those are.
      [Fernardo] Gray has reported watching us and it feeling "fake" for whatever reason. Perhaps it was because we were acting "too silly" or "too predictable" or whatever the excuse. I don't know if this has anything to do with "coming to life" feelings he reported in the past or if this is another form of Gray's parrotnoia. Like Exabier said, Gray hasn't felt comfortable to go on a wonderland adventure with us in a long time, and most of everyone would like for that to change.
      [Blue] Is there something we can do to help him calm down or reassure him that it's still us? Are there certain things we need to avoid like busy amusement parks or intense action scenes?
    • By MyNameIsLee
      Y'know how people say lucid dreaming feels as real as the real world? Is it the same for a wonderland/mindscape? I've had lucid dreams in the past and the way people describe their wonderland reminds me of lucid dreams sometimes.
      So basically, does wonderland feel as real as the real world?
    • By Ghibli
      I'm fairly new to the tulpa thing and the beginner's guide said that it's not necessary to have a wonderland. I'm not 100% sure I've got a wonderland as I never go there, but there's a separate world they can go to if they don't fancy sticking around the real world. They go there sometimes for months. I can still get in touch with them while they're there but it's more like having a phone call with them--they don't have any physical presence, and they can ignore my invitation to chat.
      Is that a wonderland?
      If they decide to come in to the real world they always seem to have stories of what they've been up to in this place. But it's not a place I share with them, as such. If we share time together, it's almost always in my actual bedroom. I'm not saying they gain a physical body but it's like I project them into my room and visualise them beside me and I can feel certain sensations like touches, etc. (although I really have to pay attention and focus on it).
      Does a wonderland need to be a separate space that I see when I close my eyes, or is what I have enough? I like to give them space and give them the option to enter the real world (ack, I'm saying enter the real world and it sounds silly saying it but you know what I mean) by their own choosing, so do I need an in-between wonderland? Do I already have it?
      Help a woman out! I'm tripping over my own thoughts
    • By Jamie
      We're talking about a part of a median system here, not a tulpa, but I figured, there is still a lot to talk about. Our wonderland was intentionally designed, there wasn't really any "inner world" stuff going on, if that makes a difference. 
      Just a few days ago, though there have been signs of this part for years and years, I finally got to see one part of Jamie's median system-self clearly: a toddler, somewhere around 12-18 months old, who we nicknamed Sunshine. I've talked with 7-year-old down to 4-year-old parts, but this is the first really little part I've ever interacted with. 
      One of the very interesting things, being co-conscious and being privy to his mental processing/thoughts, is just how vastly different it is compared to the older children, let alone the not-littles. There's very little verbal processing, it's a lot more like tulpish, or raw experience, just an unfiltered experience of the world, though he does say a few words, and understands enough to respond to some basic questions. It's just been really fasinating to be able to experience it secondhand and see how incredibly different that state or frame of mind is.
      I saw a few signs early, but only this morning did I really home in on it: Sunshine experiences wonderland quite differently, as well. I'm really not sure he even understands it's not reality. (Even though, you know, I'm a green smoke person, and he's never commented on that) One of the first signs was when he fell over (ruh-roh) and, pretty much everyone else would not simulate this, but I felt him experience pain, and pressure, and everything that goes along with smacking your head on the floor. And when I would hold him, pretty much everyone does, consciously, try to experience as much warmth and comfort as they can, but he wasn't trying at all, and was experiencing much more realistic detail and depth to the wonderland experience. 
      This morning I had Cassidy, Sunshine, and another (4-year old) little, and we were all eating yogurt in wonderland, and I realized, oh, wow. Sunshine's experience was indistinguishable from an IRL sensory experience. It felt basically the same as if the body was eating yogurt, and I was co-con with whoever was controlling the body. But just for him- not me, not Cassidy, not the other little. 
      I really suspect it has to do with his frame of mind. I feel like a lot of immersion is about "turning off" mental filters that go, "This isn't real, it's not vivid as reality, etc, etc," and when you turn those off, it becomes vivid and real. I'd say it's almost like wonderland is a dream, and only Sunshine is lucid. It's only really real to him.
      ...How can I use this to my advantage? Do you think there's a way to "flip the switch" for other headmates? Effortless, complete wonderland immersion? That sounds like fun. I mean, on the downside, he hasn't demonstrated any ability to alter the wonderland in any fashion- to him, it works 100% by reality's rules, he can't summon anything up, teleport, etc.  
      Jamie experienced something like this once, using an hour-long hypnosis video meant to simulate an acid trip, of all things. It took wonderland from 40% immersion to 80%, but only for a short time, and that felt a lot more dream/trancelike- Sunshine is not in a trance to achieve this immersion, while it's still entirely effortless. 
      - Gavin
  • Create New...