Jump to content

Question

(edited)

farcaller:

 

Well. It's live. At least some part of it.

 

The guide itself is here: http://vfp.in/nbtb, the proper announcement on reddit with details and stuff is here:

 

I'm not really familiar with the guides publication process in here, so eh. I wouldn't like if the text was copied over to the forum, as the text is subject to change for some corrections and extensions. The link is ok.

https://farcaller.gitbooks.io/nbtb/content/ - Working link provided by timethief -Ranger 

Edited by Ranger
Added timethief's working link to OP
  • Answers 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Guest Anonymous

Cool! More summer reading!

  • 0

farcaller:

 

ffs, dem parser. I fixed the link, thanks. Actually added vanity url while at it.

  • 0

My impression of this guide is rather mixed in its current state. Every redirect to your glossary isn't working, but I guess this part is still work in progress, so I won't take this in consideration for now.

 

The structure of your book is a bit off in my opinion, even though you clearly made up your mind with it beforehand. For example you have a chapter "Creating a Tulpa", but it contains practically nothing regarding the creation process, it is rather a form of foreword for the rest of the chapters after it. I think you could probably put every section after "Creating a tulpa" as a subsection to it, like you already did with "Starting the practice".

 

The biggest problem I've with this guide is that it contains too much "blabbering". I don't think it is wrong to explain certain matters in great detail, and I like how you brought up aspects of ethics in your "before you start" section. I think a lot of guides are missing this. (Your view on consciousness is a bit weird, though). The way you're wording your book would be great for novel or some philosophical mind game, but for a regular guide it is a bit excessive. The biggest part of this book feels just like the prelude to the rather short real guidelike part.

 

Also:

This is a work of fiction.

This is kind of nullifying, isn't it? You basically say that everything that follows is just fantasy.

 

My conclusion: Don't get me wrong, overall you did a rather good job with this book, even though I mainly wrote about the negative aspects. As a regular book and introdution on the topic, it is a nice read. But as a guide it simply contains too much "blabbering" around the topic and lacks real guiding. Eh, I wouldn't complain if the other guys approve this as a guide (after you're done with editing it), but personally I am only going to approve this for resources (If you make your glossary work) for now.

Tulpa: Alice

Form: Realistic Humanoid/Demonic Creation

She may or may not talk here, depends on her.

  • 0

farcaller:

 

> Every redirect to your glossary isn't working, but I guess this part is still work in progress, so I won't take this in consideration for now.

 

FFS. No, that's a bug. gitbooks had a new release yesterday and it looks like it broke lots of stuff.

 

> The structure of your book is a bit off in my opinion

 

Yes, I have a similar feeling and this is something to be improved.

 

> but for a regular guide it is a bit excessive

 

It's not a guide.

 

> You basically say that everything that follows is just fantasy

 

Yep.

 

> personally I am only going to approve this for resources (If you make your glossary work) for now.

 

I don't qualify this work as a "tulpa creation guide". It does lack the "guiding" part and that is the intent. It's still a work that could be useful for tulpa community, thus I shared it here (i.e. if it doesn't qualify — feel free to put it where it belongs).

  • 0
Guest Anonymous

What do you mean it is a work of fiction? It doesn't read like it is meant to be fiction. I am confused on that a bit.

  • 0

farcaller:

 

gitbooks crew said the fix for glossary links is going to roll out to prod in a few hours.


> What do you mean it is a work of fiction?

 

That is a legal note. I take no responsibility about what you will do after reading the book.

  • 0
Guest Anonymous

Is this sarcasm or satire somehow?

  • 0
Guest Anonymous

I see why you are saying "it is a work of fiction" to protect yourself legally, but it kinda instantly removes all credibility to what you are going to say next. It's like saying this "This is a No Bullshit book on tulpas. Everything from here on is bull shit."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...