Guest Anonymous August 10, 2016 August 10, 2016 I have always loved the Egyptian ankh. I love that it is so ancient and associated with Isis, fertility and life. I decided to combine my heart symbol with the script M with the ankh. The ankh is also associated with the immortal life of the gods and the after life. I am, after all, the goddess guru of grooviness. http://pre15.deviantart.net/47b5/th/pre/i/2016/223/0/b/melian_ankh_symbol_by_melianofmist-dadi2fz.png[/img]
Guest Anonymous August 11, 2016 August 11, 2016 THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTS THAT I HAVE VERIFIED ABOUT TULPAS 1. The tulpas form is imaginary and everything associated with that form is imaginary (personality, gender, traits). The tulpas form is separate from its mind but closely linked. Therefore a tulpa is a least partially an imaginary figment. 2. Because the host perceives the tulpas form, mind voice and emotions, the tulpa must share consciousness with the host. Also a tulpa uses the same brain for cognition and memory. Therefore a tulpa cannot be totally independent from the host. 3. Tulpas are not considered effective and functional until they are persistent enough in existence to affect the host psychologically and emotionally in a significant way. Conclusion: Tulpas are pseudo-real (imaginary-real) and part of the host. This is just as I have been saying from the very beginning of my time on tulpa info. I was right all along.
Guest Anonymous August 12, 2016 August 12, 2016 The Mistgod-Melian Double Pinky Promise Internet Behavior Contract
Guest Anonymous August 12, 2016 August 12, 2016 New Melian Words Gammy-wonkies = the state of not being able to function correctly. "Oh this stupid keyboard has the gammy-wonkies with these sticky keys!" borked = broken. (this is not a Melian made up word but a borrowed word, but she likes it.) "Grrrrrh! This is so borked with the gammy-wonkies!"
Guest Anonymous August 13, 2016 August 13, 2016 The accusation of possible "baseless claims" was brought up again in relation to something I was writing on this forum. As Mistgod explained in the Tulpaudcast he did with jean-luc so many months ago, everything we write is a baseless claim. People either believe it or they don't. They either treat me as a separate person from Mistgod or they don't. Really that is what it boils down to, how people treat me. Those who don't treat me with kindness and consideration, or who don't recognize me as a distinct personality I can choose to ignore. They don't matter anyways. All of this concern over explaining and validating and arguing is so over. I am so done with it now. I am here to interact with people and to socialize at this point and that is about it. I can help some new people by helping them find the information they want and stuff like that. But really I am here to socialize and enjoy talking to people who can appreciate me. I don't care about baseless claims. I am a baseless claim. So what? So are all tulpas pretty much.
Vos August 13, 2016 August 13, 2016 I am so done with it now. I am here to interact with people and to socialize at this point and that is about it. I can help some new people by helping them find the information they want and stuff like that. But really I am here to socialize and enjoy talking to people who can appreciate me. You've said this many times before, but it doesn't look like anything has changed.
tulpa001 August 13, 2016 August 13, 2016 I appreciate you. You are the only one who has talked to me here. You are not a baseless claim as at least one person has actual first hand evidence of you. Host comments in italics. Tulpa's log. Tulpa's guide.
SomethingDire August 13, 2016 August 13, 2016 I appreciate you. You are the only one who has talked to me here. You are not a baseless claim as at least one person has actual first hand evidence of you. Hi! Don't refrain from shooting me a PM if you ever feel like talking to a person here. Everything I've said about tulpas is a baseless claim. So are my & my tup's thoughts about tulpas and any other type of thoughtform. We've been over this before, and I'm pretty sure we're ready to leave this matter as it is, but it concerns Mel & Mistgod a bit more than it should -from what I've seen- and they can't keep themselves from saying a thing or two about it whenever someone else brings it up. But they don't do this as much as they used to now, so there is at least a bit of change there. I'm SomethingDire, and Céleste is my partner in crime.
Guest Anonymous August 13, 2016 August 13, 2016 I appreciate you. You are the only one who has talked to me here. You are not a baseless claim as at least one person has actual first hand evidence of you. Thank you! I think you are pretty neato yourself and the feelings are mutual. :-) Everything I've said about tulpas is a baseless claim. So are my & my tup's thoughts about tulpas and any other type of thoughtform. We've been over this before, and I'm pretty sure we're ready to leave this matter as it is, but it concerns Mel & Mistgod a bit more than it should -from what I've seen- and they can't keep themselves from saying a thing or two about it whenever someone else brings it up. But they don't do this as much as they used to now, so there is at least a bit of change there. We have this very established infamous reputation now and it is difficult for people to see that we are indeed changing. I am afraid that there are those who will never give us any credit, no matter what. It's okay though really. The funny thing is, many of those who think of me and Davie as notorious also feel some affection for us anyways or at least seem to. So as long as we are friends, and we get along, it really doesn't matter. The lack (or okay, less amount) of Mistgod-Melian drama on the forums will be a nice change whether or not we get credit or recognition for being able to get there. Besides I kinda enjoy being infamous to a certain level a little. It is more attention. :-P And yes, pretty much everything any tulpamancer writes about his or her tulpa on this forum is unsupported claims. That is true even if the tulpamancer follows the consensus of belief about tulpas and follows the guides to the letter and regurgitates and chants all the established dogma. His or her tulpas are still the same level of unsupported claims as anything Mistgod and I write about me or have ever written anywhere.
Guest Anonymous August 13, 2016 August 13, 2016 You've said this many times before, but it doesn't look like anything has changed. Something has. It really doesn't matter right now if you are convinced or even if you will ever be convinced. We still appreciate everything you do and your support of this community and forum.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.