Jump to content

Planting a Tulpa Seed and How to Listen to It


Recommended Posts

Sock, Thank you for your input. Flaws in my opinion are important. It may be a bit of a shortcut, but I feel like it strengthens the foundation and can make them even more different thank the host. I have added a section to the guide explaining that the personality you are creating is just a starting point and will grow from there. I'm not sure if your statement was made before or after the latest additions I've made. Finally, this isn't a guide saying to puppet your tulpa all the time. It's a guide saying not to worry if you are puppeting. You don't actually force them to say anything, that is the difference with my way and puppeting.

 

J.Iscariot, I cannot write a guide that works for everyone. I'm writing about what I know, and what I have seen. If I tried to write about a method that I have not done, or had experience with it would help no one. If this guide does not work for someone, then there is nothing I can do about that. Other methods did not work for me, it wasn't the guide's fault. Also, I never meant to imply that tulpas should not be considered people. My views on what I think they are, is a point for another thread.

 

Groovy, don't let anyone tell you what you do or do not have. You're just as valid as any other tulpa.

Host: Ayre

Tulpas: Coda and Segno

 

Shameless Progress Report Plug:

Ayre's Opus 1: Informal informative index of inhabitants in an invisible inner-world.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Anonymous

Groovy, don't let anyone tell you what you do or do not have. You're just as valid as any other tulpa.

 

I gotta leave for a while. We are getting the Mistgod-Melian crazies again. We need a lot of time to calm down and sort it out. Ayre, you keep writing wonderful stuff on the forum my friend. I do like the guide a lot. Thanks AGGuy for the PM that knocked my head.


Thanks mods for deleting my useless stuff on this thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"J.Iscariot, I cannot write a guide that works for everyone. I'm writing about what I know, and what I have seen. If I tried to write about a method that I have not done, or had experience with it would help no one. If this guide does not work for someone, then there is nothing I can do about that. Other methods did not work for me, it wasn't the guide's fault. Also, I never meant to imply that tulpas should not be considered people. My views on what I think they are, is a point for another thread. "

 

That, I understand. Even then, if we had to bring together the people who parroted and it worked out for them just fine, we'd go towards other communities and types of thoughtforms (soulbonding systems headmates etc etc), which is fine if we want to widen the spectrum of the tulpa phenomenon online, but that's not up to me. With that being said, thing is that you write a guide, and a beginner reads it. If they try it out and it doesn't work, with your guide being the only thing related to parroting aside from Fede's method (the thread itself isn't bumped, I talked to Fede a few times, he's a smart guy but not in tulpamancy), you're kind of responsible for them losing out on a while of efforts. Not trying to play any guilt cards here, of course, but if parroting doesn't work and your method is the only thing put 'in motion', then that poses a problem. There is a very large success rate for FAQ and Irish_ methods, I know people who tried out parroting and ended up abandoning (and I found even worse displays of tulpamancy that I won't discuss because censor censor drama), it's just not a very accepted technique. I didn't write my post with the thought 'oh i am going to show them how good of a tulpamancer i am, yay all against parroting', if people want to parrot that's their own thing really, they can do what they want, but with what I said regarding the success rate, and the difficulties one would face in identifying whether it truly is their tulpa or just them fooling themselves (and there have been such cases due to parroting, my bias against it comes from the fact that I know it's not my tulpa and that in my own case it would be self-deception, people have serious, serious issues with doubt in this community), it would be and excuse the term shitty overall if it really came into motion, not for me or for the sake of me being a good tulpamancer or coming off as an elitist.

 

Tell me, out of curiosity, why should I follow your guide and not FAQ's guide or any other guide? Of course this isn't related to anything on-topic, it's just something intriguing to me, because the other methods look more promising. To any outsider, your guide could come off as straight up self-deception with due respect, I apologize if I came off as a dick, that's an issue I'm trying to work on.

A wise man once said: 'Before judging a man, walk a mile in his shoes. After that, who cares? He's a mile away, and you've got new shoes.'

 

Graced are those who could avoid this phenomenon. This is perhaps the worst expression of evil in humanity's history, but who am I to judge?

Link to post
Share on other sites

J.Iscariot, I'll PM you and we can talk there.

 

This guide is supposed to just be about personality how I got over thinking that I was parroting and my own doubts, not necessarily the full creation of a tulpa. It's supplemental, and that's all I wanted it to be. I might state this explicitly at the start of the guide.

Host: Ayre

Tulpas: Coda and Segno

 

Shameless Progress Report Plug:

Ayre's Opus 1: Informal informative index of inhabitants in an invisible inner-world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure thing

 

I'm not GAT or anything so in the end the approval of your guide relies on their general vote or something if I got this correctly, what I posted was just my own opinion over stuff. Excuse me if I don't reply to your PM today because I'm pretty busy and stuff

A wise man once said: 'Before judging a man, walk a mile in his shoes. After that, who cares? He's a mile away, and you've got new shoes.'

 

Graced are those who could avoid this phenomenon. This is perhaps the worst expression of evil in humanity's history, but who am I to judge?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see nothing that's really wrong with this method, you do make a note that personality isn't necessary even if it's the most important step in your eyes, so that's pretty much the biggest issue out of the way. This is for those who do want to focus on personality. I am a bit worried about all the off-site links that have some useful information, but I don't think we can really ask you to go and write something about them yourself as it's an entirely different beast to go writing about what makes a good character compared to like, some tulpa-making guide.

 

The part about parroting confuses me slightly. I read that what you do here is parroting and puppeting, but you say that it isn't that in your guide. Is this you trying to tell people that parroting isn't parroting so they stop worrying about it, or did I miss something? While it can be a good idea to try to fool others into thinking one way so they don't doubt all that much, I suggest against it as it all falls apart when they do question it.

 

I guess you're saying "don't worry about it", but you might want to be a bit more clear about it. This is a parroting guide as far as I know, and there's nothing wrong with that. It's a method. But I think you shouldn't try to hide it.

 

Brings me to the last point in the contact section about parroting and such: saying everything is your tulpa. This is probably one of the biggest tulpa-killers, because it creates a doubt spiral after they stop blindly believing and start questioning everything. By then the "proof" they require is so much that it's impossible to get, so it's extremely hard to recover. I know, for many of us, it's as simple as accepting that something might not be us and then in the end we feel so stupid that we ever doubted those things that clearly weren't us. But for newcomers, this isn't the best idea. It really is a journey and by trying to skip right to the end, you lose the foundation that was required to realize what you should believe in.

 

 

Kind of off-topic but I want to make a note about the flaws too! When it comes to your guide, I don't think the flaw section is bad: it makes a note of how it's not necessary to intentionally create them and everyone has them whether they want them or not. But I'll say that a well-rounded character has flaws, yes. A character that is flawless is boring and unrealistic. But a well-rounded person is probably someone who tries to get over their major flaws, because there is no person who doesn't have any flaws.

 

Should go without saying that there is no tulpa who is flawless.

The THE SUBCONCIOUS ochinchin occultists frt.sys (except Roswell because he doesn't want to be a part of it)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do make a note that personality isn't necessary even if it's the most important step in your eyes, so that's pretty much the biggest issue out of the way.

 

To me it is the most important, but I did want people to know that others in this community may not think that way. I guess the point of saying it was to inform new people of the other side of thinking as well as reiterating the subjectivity of my guide and guides in general. (EDIT: I rewrote most of the foreword to better reflect this.)

 

I am a bit worried about all the off-site links that have some useful information, but I don't think we can really ask you to go and write something about them yourself as it's an entirely different beast to go writing about what makes a good character compared to like, some tulpa-making guide.

 

My rational here is that the early stages of creating another consciousness starts, in essence, with just making a fictional character. It then forms more depth and automation on its own until it finally becomes a true tulpa. This rational comes from the side of writers and role players that end up forming a tulpa by accident. (EDIT: I have now stated this more clearly and expand upon it throughout the guide.)

 

The part about parroting confuses me slightly. I read that what you do here is parroting and puppeting, but you say that it isn't that in your guide.

 

Well, this is something that I've had a hard time communicating throughout my drafts. I'll attempt it here. See, you are not actively and forcefully controlling what your tulpa says, which is the difference (to me) of parroting and not parroting. You are sensing the intent of your tulpa and the personality that you have been cultivating. You are talking to your tulpa and waiting for a response. But, I'm attempting to take this a step deeper and trying to explain what I think is happening when the tulpa responds (in the early stages) if you have done extensive personality forcing (which I did in my tulpa's creation). When a new tulpa responds, all it knows (and all you know about it) is the identity you have given it. I think that if new people understand this early on that it may help in actually hearing the tulpa when it does speak (and not just writing it off as I did for months) at the start. I think that when you begin, your preconceived notions about your tulpa is your tulpa. And that is how you begin to actually understand who and what you have created. (EDIT: I have now included this explanation into the guide.)

 

aying everything is your tulpa. This is probably one of the biggest tulpa-killers, because it creates a doubt spiral after they stop blindly believing and start questioning everything.

 

Is there anything further reading on this, or examples that you can link me? I would love to read more on this understanding as this seemed to be conventional knowledge, for the most part, when I was a part of the community about a year ago. Things may have changed, and conventions may have changed. I would love to bridge this gap if i can.

 

It really is a journey and by trying to skip right to the end, you lose the foundation that was required to realize what you should believe in.

 

I guess I am trying to impart the knowledge that I have gained from my own experiences, and trying to help new people avoid the pitfalls I have fallen into. Maybe those pitfalls are part of the learning experience, but I see no real harm in telling people what has worked for me. I don't think that simply reading this will let people skip to the end, but maybe they will consider what my own experiences has taught me.

 

Kind of off-topic but I want to make a note about the flaws too! When it comes to your guide, I don't think the flaw section is bad: it makes a note of how it's not necessary to intentionally create them and everyone has them whether they want them or not. But I'll say that a well-rounded character has flaws, yes. A character that is flawless is boring and unrealistic. But a well-rounded person is probably someone who tries to get over their major flaws, because there is no person who doesn't have any flaws.

 

Should go without saying that there is no tulpa who is flawless.

 

This falls back to what I said earlier that a tulpa in the very early stages is essentially a character that the host had created. It's up to the host and the tulpa to make this character a real person.

Host: Ayre

Tulpas: Coda and Segno

 

Shameless Progress Report Plug:

Ayre's Opus 1: Informal informative index of inhabitants in an invisible inner-world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I liked the first introduction better (or well, the last one at least, I think you have made many changes!), but I think I'll have to give this one some time. I don't think you are really addressing any doubt problems though, because "just believe!" is not a proper response to doubt problems.

 

About the doubt and why "just believe" ended up being the thing people told others is pretty simple. In the beginning we had those crazy hour counts and you just could not have a tulpa before 100 hours had passed or something, and the first time they spoke would be totally alien and in an imposed voice. That's not the case, as we know now. But the people back in the day made their tulpas work really hard to be noticed, and some never did even if they probably had a vocal tulpa at that time. So, with more knowledge, these older hosts felt pretty stupid. If only I had believed earlier, you know?

 

So that's what they told people. Just believe, that's what got us here in the end. But every thought that comes into your head is not a tulpa, and some people need more time trying to figure out where the line between tulpa and not tulpa goes. This creates a lot of confusion and questions, and when there's nothing to fall back on because everything they built their foundation of a tulpa on was built on blind belief alone. All it takes is a mind that prefers proof before it believes or a person who feels cheated because the whole tulpa thing now feels like a delusion and everyone else just "believes" everything is a tulpa when it probably isn't.

 

I did write about a mindset here that touches up on why blind belief isn't the best way to go in maybe more detail? Thing is, this is one of the more common tulpa problems I run into, and the success rate of getting over the doubt spiral is very low compared to those who just give up because it just doesn't feel the same anymore.

 

 

Re: flaws: I know that you are kind of going for the "build a character" angle and that's fine, I guess. But if you take it to the end, you're stuck with a person with flaws anyway!

The THE SUBCONCIOUS ochinchin occultists frt.sys (except Roswell because he doesn't want to be a part of it)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you've addressed all the issues I had with this. With what Sands said about the doubt; maybe. I'm not sure that what's written says, "Believe everything," but maybe it's ambiguous. I don't feel strongly about it. I guess you can follow Sands' advice about it. In the meantime I'll approve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

# The Contact and Interaction sections seem to butt heads from my view. In the Interaction section, there's an implication that the host is still making up responses consciously to a degree, based on how the figure is programmed and the expectations of the host. Contact then says that the host isn't making things up for the tulpa to say based on the figures programming and the host's expectations. Is it that between Interaction and Contact, the host stopped assuming responses? Or is it that because the figure is so defined and detailed, the responses they give are in-line with the host's expectations, even though the host isn't actually trying to think stuff for them?

 

# I think the issue here is that the guide is very focused on trying to mitigate unconscious puppeting fears. Reading to the Contact section makes it very clear why the proceeding steps concerning definition are so incredibly detailed: it's a fail safe. While I do think a proper viewpoint about things can help mitigate them, ultimately overcoming fears of unconscious puppeting is something the host will have to do on their own to some degree. The trouble with focussing too much on an idea to take away parroting fears is that the fears will try to shake even that. After all, some people will doubt if they even exist, or are even breathing, no idea is invincible against strong enough doubt. What's needed in this case is to develop enough mental strength to either wrestle off, ignore, or discredit the doubts, even doubting the doubts themselves may be necessary. So the host taking time to strengthen their own will power may be necessary for them to go forward, while developing their tulpa in tandem.

 

# I wrote a little something about my own mindset here. It's not quite as detailed and full-bodied as Sands', but it may be useful for you.

 

I feel you have something solid up to the Interaction and Contact sections. The previous steps look to me as a nice, solid way to build a foundation for a tulpa to be made with. It's just that the interaction bits need to be cleaned up and clarified. I'll be keeping my eye out.

 

Peace

Sock Cottonwell's

Sketchbook, Journal, and Ask thread.

Peace

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By JD1215
      [align=justify]JD’s Guide to Personality Forcing
      Personality forcing can be considered an optional step in the process of creating a tulpa, and it’s entirely okay for you to not force a personality at all. Your tulpa can and will develop its own traits and quirks naturally through life experiences. However, it may aid your tulpa’s development to at least partially define her personality as a groundwork for your tulpa to grow or deviate from. The act of personality forcing itself also puts a lot of focus on your tulpa being a separate sentient entity from you, giving you a nice head start on her becoming an autonomous being. There are many ways to influence or define your tulpa’s personality, and what will work best for you may not work as well for someone else. So I’m going to cover several forms of personality forcing that you can experiment with and employ on your tulpa: list-based trait forcing, symbolic trait forcing, parrot forcing, and music forcing. Each of these are varied enough from each other that at least one of them should cover your needs sufficiently.
       
      List Based Trait Forcing
      This method of personality forcing is covered in the earliest guides of modern tulpa creation. It’s very straightforward, and consists of defining your tulpa’s personality with an outline of many broad traits. In FAQ Man’s Personality Guide, Dane suggests listing about 30-35 traits, and speaking directly to your tulpa about how those traits are manifested in her. You should talk to your tulpa about, “how the trait helps them rationalize, how the trait works within their logic system, how the trait plays a role in morality, their perception, their likes, dislikes, social endeavors, faith, personality, quirks, emotions, how the trait makes them interpret their own emotions, how the trait plays a role in their hobbies, and many other things not listed here.” The advantage to this method is that you will become very intimate with how your tulpa’s personality works, as the whole process is quite straightforward. The disadvantage is that this method is generally slower and less exciting than other methods.
       
      Symbolic Trait Forcing
      This method of personality forcing is also covered in earlier guides, but is aimed at people who may not be content with the rinse-repeat trait lecture method. It essentially consists of creating a more abstract way of attributing personality traits to your tulpa that resonates well with you. Common symbolisms include letting the tulpa absorb trait-orbs, drinking trait-potions, etc. This method gives much room for your own creativity. For all anyone cares, your tulpa could be eating broad trait cupcakes with more intricately defined trait sprinkles on top. That advantage to this method is that whatever symbolism you come up with, there’s really no way it can fail. The disadvantages are that is can also be somewhat slower than other methods, and has a little more room for some unpredictably.
       
      Parrot Forcing
      Parrot forcing is a less commonly used method, since the acts of parroting and puppeting tulpa is still somewhat controversial. I personally find this to be the most efficient method for myself, although it does have its cons compared to other methods. Our personalities today are largely defined by our experiences and memories as a person. We aren’t just born with personality traits -- genetic predisposition aside. The goal of parrot forcing is to allow our tulpa to experience life so it can develop a personality in a similar way we do. Where other methods of personality forcing involve telling your tulpa how to act, parrot forcing involves letting them experience how to act through parroting/puppeting. What do you do while you puppet your tulpa? Whatever you want. Make her walk, make her talk. Take her places in your wonderland, force food and games for her. Act through her the way you think she would act. Is she lovable and sweet? Have her hug you whenever you visit her in your wonderland. Is she totally tsundere? Make her act like she wants nothing to do with you (but really she does). You’re basically kind of roleplaying her using her body, while you’re with her in your body. When you start to feel like you’re really getting used to this exercise, possibly in a few days, stop puppeting cold turkey and let your tulpa take the reigns. The advantage of this method is that with it you can tackle personality, speech patterns, gait, and many other behavioral things all at once. The disadvantage of this method is that you may feel like you missed out on watching your tulpa grow from scratch through it’s own will and intentions.
       
      Music Forcing
      Forcing personality through music is something I’ve been experimenting with on my youngest tulpa. It involves creating a playlist of songs with themes, moods, or lyrics that reflect the personality you want your tulpa to have, and listening to it with your tulpa while refocusing the meaning of the songs to their personality. It’s like attributing a theme song to them. For example, I wanted my tulpa to be a really energetic party animal, so I played a lot of energetic J-Pop songs towards her. The advantage of this method is that you can tackle both personality and voice at once, if the songs you are playing contain the reference voice you want to use for your tulpa -- not to mention that it’s really fun in general. The disadvantage is that it can be the most unclear method of defining your tulpa’s personality, and you may get tired of listening to the same songs over and over.
       
      Creating Your Own Method
      There’s a possibility that none of these methods really suit you, or sound appealing. Fortunately, tulpaforcing can be a very creative process, as the rules and laws of it are easily bent by your own will. You may want to go down the path of concocting your own personality forcing method. The focus point of your method is how well it can communicate the host’s intentions to the tulpa, which may actually vary depending on your personality and the desired personality of your tulpa. Perhaps if you wanted a very artistic tulpa, you could create a forcing method involving abstract painting with your tulpa, collaborating with her to create paintings that convey her personality. Or maybe you’d like a tulpa who enjoys traveling around with you; you could take your tulpa to places that instill emotions and memories you’d like to correlate with your tulpa’s personality. There are many possibilities, but the most important bit is that your method can clearly convey your intentions to your tulpa to properly influence her personality. Other than that, you're at your own creative freedom.[/align]
    • Guest
      By Guest
      Hi, so I'm a pretty active day-dreamer and have preexisting "characters". I'm wondering if I can use one of those and just give it a personality, and if that is the case I have a question about parroting. With parroting do you make the tulpa say " I have trait X and Y" or do you make the tulpa act the way you want? So as an example is do I make my tulpa say "I like hot dogs" or do I have a wonderland and have it eat a hot dog?
    • By A Mystic Mess
      I'm very new to tulpamancy, and I've only just started to make my first tulpa, but she seems very angry and violent already. I often receive waves of anger and irritation from her when I try and talk to her. since she is still new, and can't exactly respond, I can't really ask her what's wrong..
    • By Carlos
      My tulpa she is a bodhisattva, she does not feel negative emotions, she is never angry, she is never sad. She feels compassion for my suffering, and the suffering of all people in the world. She forgives me every time I make a mistake, she wants me to be in the wonderland forever with her. She feels love and compassion much of the time, these two emotions of her are so strong that even I can feel it. Is it correct that my tulpa does not feel negative emotions? Why should I grant negative emotions, if I don't want my tulpa to suffer from having negative emotions?
×
×
  • Create New...