QContrary

A Starting Imposition Guide

Recommended Posts

While visualizing the mailbox do it open or closed eye?

 

Also, how to impose upon other senses?

 

I believe it's supposed to be open-eye visualization.

"Otherwise it wouldn't be called imposition. :P"

 

I am also interested in your second question, but that is not what this guide entails, so I wouldn't keep your hopes up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>When your tulpa uses spatial visualization to overlay themselves over your physical vision, you'll be able to see them. Not with your eyes, but with your mind. And that's imposition.

 

Are you implying that imposition isn't about physically seeing a tulpa, but using your mind's eye?


Tulpa: Sierra

Forcing since July 2012

Couguhl’s Progress Report

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>When your tulpa uses spatial visualization to overlay themselves over your physical vision, you'll be able to see them. Not with your eyes, but with your mind. And that's imposition.

 

Are you implying that imposition isn't about physically seeing a tulpa, but using your mind's eye?

 

That's what imposition is. You can't physically see something that isn't physically there, obviously.


frt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After a months worth of imposition sessions and no luck this seems like a light in the dark to us. Crossed fingers. [i'm fingerless!] That's nice, Pruria, everyone's intrigued, please go on. [No ;_;]


Pruria Joal (Pegasus)

Working on: Imposition

Hieldy (Moogle)

Working on: Possession/imposition

Samantha (Griffon)

Working on: Deafness/form

 

And please, call me G.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

That's what imposition is. You can't physically see something that isn't physically there, obviously.

 

Well yes, but I thought that was why people make tulpas in the first place - in order to create a hallucination that can be sensed and not simply imagined. Perhaps I am using a different term or something.

 

I've heard a lot of feedback from many people like Q2 saying that their tulpae are as realistic-looking as someone standing in the room.

Are you stating that this is impossible?

 

Mega-depression on standby


Tulpa: Sierra

Forcing since July 2012

Couguhl’s Progress Report

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couguhl, I can confirm that it's quite possible, at least visually. I don't have anyone imposed yet, but I have had a few very brief flashes of seeing my first tulpa, and she appeared very realistic and sometimes fully solid.

 

I think Avalanche is being pedantic and saying the cells in your retinas will never be stimulated by photons that bounced off your tulpa. Whereas by "physically see" we usually mean "hallucinate well enough they're indistinguishable from physical objects".


Lyra: human female, ~17

Evan: boy, ~14, was an Eevee

Anera: anime-style girl, ~12; Lyra made her

My blog :: Time expectations are bad (forcing time targets are good though)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I think Avalanche is being pedantic and saying the cells in your retinas will never be stimulated by photons that bounced off your tulpa. Whereas by "physically see" we usually mean "hallucinate well enough they're indistinguishable from physical objects".

 

I'm so pedantic you guys


frt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couguhl, I can confirm that it's quite possible, at least visually. I don't have anyone imposed yet, but I have had a few very brief flashes of seeing my first tulpa, and she appeared very realistic and sometimes fully solid.

 

I think Avalanche is being pedantic and saying the cells in your retinas will never be stimulated by photons that bounced off your tulpa. Whereas by "physically see" we usually mean "hallucinate well enough they're indistinguishable from physical objects".

 

Oh, excellent. Avalanche scared me for a second. Imposition was one of the main reasons I originally wanted to make a tulpa.

 

But if he would really like to be pedantic, he could say that physical objects in general aren't reliable because all of your optical data is experienced once it has been processed by your brain, so you have no sensory proof that the physical world even exists (ie your eyes don't 'see').


Tulpa: Sierra

Forcing since July 2012

Couguhl’s Progress Report

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.